RE: Problem with RPC over HTTP Tom's way

  • From: "William Lefkovics" <william@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:55:02 -0800

I insist on amazing.

Tom, good job on your ISA2004 book.

-----Original Message-----
From: A. M. Salim [mailto:msalim@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 6:52 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Problem with RPC over HTTP Tom's way


> As a best practice, you should not run Exchange 2003 on servers that 
> also function as Windows domain controllers. Instead, you should 
> configure Exchange servers and Windows domain controllers separately.
> However, if your organization requires that you run Exchange 2003 on a 
> domain controller, consider the following limitations:

Running Exchange on a DC is not only supported, it is a "normal" situation
for many small businesses that are using SBS (Small Business Server).
There is nothing fundamentally wrong with this setup.  In fact, one could
argue that it is amazing that you insist on requiring two physical servers
(minimum two, maybe three if you also insist on FE/BE) for supporting 20-30
little email accounts in a small organization!

best regards

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: Leading
Network Software Directory:
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: Windows Security
Resource Site: Network Security Library: Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
william@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: