RE: Multiple Forests Yet?

  • From: "Mulnick, Al" <Al.Mulnick@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'[ExchangeList]'" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:50:31 -0400

Upgrade to Exchange 2003 would be the easiest path. It's a tested
configuration up to (last I heard) 5 forest scenarios.  Really helps if the
client is Outlook 2003 and can use Kerb auth.  Otherwise, you'll have issues
trying to integrate multiple forests but could conceivably do it with MMS
3.0.  That's not that expensive in the Exchange 2003 timeframe as I
understand pricing to be.


-----Original Message-----
From: Devon Harding - GTHLA [mailto:DHarding@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 3:05 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Multiple Forests Yet?

Did anyone figure out how to make Exchange 2000 work with multiple forests
without buying those expensive ($2K+) sync software?

Devon Harding
System Administrator
Gilat Latin America

This e-mail is intended for the above named addressee(s), and may contain
information which is confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, please inform us immediately: you should not copy or use this
e-mail for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any person.

List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
Leading Network Software Directory: No.1 ISA
Server Resource Site: Windows Security Resource
Site: Network Security Library: Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
al.mulnick@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank email to

Other related posts: