RE: Information store limit
- From: "Devin McBride" <devin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:32:54 -0800
I would assume for performance reasons, you would want to set a limit on
the number of people in each mailbox store...a server can only handle so
much traffic. Doesn't mean you can't add servers/stores/storage groups
etc...
Devin
-----Original Message-----
From: Douglas M. Long [mailto:admindoug@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 02, 2006 8:18 AM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Information store limit
http://www.MSExchange.org/
I was talking to someone today and they said that real world experience
says
that you shouldn't have more than 250 users in an information store
(Exchange 2003) for performance reasons. I have been under the
assumption
that the only real limits were purely based of the particular scenario
(such
as disaster recovery expectations, disk IO, number of items in
mailboxes,
etc).
So, is there any validity to the statement, or is it more scenario
based?
What about with Exchange 2000?
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
devin@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Other related posts:
