RE: GFI Mailsecurity or Sybari Antigen ?

  • From: "Dolly Bareqet" <dolly@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 09:36:08 +0200


I had also tested both of them. I used to use Symantec, wasn't so
friendly to my taste. I finally decided on Sybari since it uses more
engines. I have purchased the whole package but the anti Spam. For the
anti spam I'm using GFI mail essentials.



-----Original Message-----
From: Periyasamy, Raj [mailto:Raj.Periyasamy@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 9:28 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] GFI Mailsecurity or Sybari Antigen ?

We are evaluating a few products for gateway virus scanning. I am very
happy about Sybari Antigen for SMTP in general. But I just saw GFI
Mailsecurity, and it looks a very competitive product. However, I am not
able to get much feedback on the product. Can you experts give your
feedback on GFIMS. How does it perform when compared to NAI Webshield,
Symantec and Sybari ?



List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
Leading Network Software Directory:
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site:
Windows Security Resource Site:
Network Security Library:
Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:

Other related posts: