RE: Exchange SP2 realse note questions [AND IMF]
- From: Jabber Wock <jabberwock99@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 03:57:03 -0500
Hi,
One other question ... IMF 2.0 is now "included" and the release notes talk
about having to manually create a container, and a registry key. Is this
necessary if I did not have IMF enabled?
Mike
On 11/26/05, Sarbjit Singh Gill <ssgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> http://www.MSExchange.org/ <http://www.msexchange.org/>
> a) In order to make use of the improvements in OAB 4.0, the Outlook 2003
> client will need to have SP2 applied and your Exchange Servers need SP2 for
> Exchange 2003.
> b) SP2 is mainly performance improvements and some download issues.. ( a
> nice readup on various OAB:
> http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Offline-Address-Book-Best-Practice.html
> )
>
> /Gill
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Jabber Wock [mailto:jabberwock99@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 26, 2005 4:00 PM
> *To:* [ExchangeList]
> *Subject:* [exchangelist] Exchange SP2
>
>
>
> http://www.MSExchange.org/ <http://www.msexchange.org/> Hi all,
>
> I was reading through the release notes, as I am planning to install this
> on our Exchange servers. I noticed a few things:
>
> a) The Offline Address Book has a new version 4.0, and it mentions
> that Office 2003 SP2 is required. Is this Office 2003 SP2 for workstations
> (user computers)? Or is this Office SP2 to be installed on the server? We
> do not normally install Office 2003 on any servers but it was not clear to
> me from the release notes whether we need to download and install this on
> the server regardless.
>
> b) What are the ramifications of user computers NOT having the latest
> Office 2003 SP2 update (and hence support for OAB 4.0)? Will this cause
> any problems? Or will they simply be unable to use some new fancy OAB
> feature? Will users start being bombarded with any error messages telling
> them to update to Office SP2 all of a sudden? Or will this mismatch be a
> silent harmless affair? (Exchange 2003 SP2 on server, Office updates not up
> to SP2 on client computer)
>
> c) I also noticed that there is a new .NET 2.0. Is this needed for
> Exchange? Is there any harm in installing .NET 2.0 even if its not needed
> (i.e. Exchange uses older version of .NET)
>
> TIA!
> JW
> ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives:
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange
> Newsletters:
> http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp------------------------------------------------------
> Visit
> TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
> http://www.techgenix.com------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently
> subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
> ssgill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Report abuse to
> info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
> http://www.techgenix.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as:
> jabberwock99@xxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
> Report abuse to info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Other related posts:
