Re: Do Diskeeper 9 and Exchange 2003 Play nice?
- From: "Steve Moffat" <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 18:09:19 -0300
Raxco's perfectdisk is tremendous. It will defrag the exchange databases
by linking it into the exchange utilities..in effect a gui for them. I
use it weekly and have had no trouble with it at all.
S
-----Original Message-----
From: Nick F [mailto:nfitzpatrick@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 5:43 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Do Diskeeper 9 and Exchange 2003 Play nice?
http://www.MSExchange.org/
I am familiar with eseutil and isinteg however Microsoft strongly
recommends against using the built-in defrag utilities as they can (and
I have seen it totally screw up an edb) damage the edb. I've seen
messages damaged and attachments blown into oblivion - there's NO way I
would ever use the utility on a functional/ing edb.1
Taking the db offline for defraging would just be too inconvenient - I
was thinking that it would be nice to use the cheesily named
"set-it-and-forget-it" function of Diskeeper.
The first time I saw the defrag utility in Windows 2000 all I could
think
was: "Gee, now this looks familiar..." :-)
Thanks guys.
------------------------------------------------------
List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp
------------------------------------------------------
Visit TechGenix.com for more information about our other sites:
http://www.techgenix.com
------------------------------------------------------
You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as:
ExchangeMailingList@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
The correct technical term for haggis stalking is "havering".
Other related posts:
