Re: Do Diskeeper 9 and Exchange 2003 Play nice?
- From: "Nick F" <nfitzpatrick@xxxxxxxx>
- To: exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:42:56 -0600
I am familiar with eseutil and isinteg however Microsoft strongly
recommends against using the built-in defrag utilities as they can (and I
have seen it totally screw up an edb) damage the edb. I?ve seen messages
damaged and attachments blown into oblivion ? there?s NO way I would ever
use the utility on a functional/ing edb.1
Taking the db offline for defraging would just be too inconvenient ? I was
thinking that it would be nice to use the cheesily named
?set-it-and-forget-it? function of Diskeeper.
The first time I saw the defrag utility in Windows 2000 all I could think
was: ?Gee, now this looks familiar?? :-)
Thanks guys.
Other related posts: