Thank you, Mark! So is it ok to have the transaction log files in the same E2k files' physical disk - 1st SCSI DSK? And 2nd SCSI physical DKS only with database files (I'm looking from disaster recovery angle!) And how is the IDE HD - c: = 100MB and remaining capacity - d: drive - OS? My point is, is this give low performance? -----Original Message----- From: Mark Fugatt [mailto:mark@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 11:17 AM To: [ExchangeList] Subject: [exchangelist] RE: Disk partition for Ex2k with Disaster recovery.... http://www.MSExchange.org/ Hi Hirantha <big wave> First thing is C: should be NTFS not FAT16. Split the transaction logs and databases up, you should not have the databases and transaction logs on the same physical drive, if the drive fails you have lost both. Hope this helps Mark Fugatt MCT, MCSE, Microsoft Exchange MVP Pentech Office Solutions Inc Tel: 585 586 3890 Cell: 585 576 4750 Fax: 585 249 0316 www.4mcts.com www.exchangetrainer.com -----Original Message----- From: Hirantha Wijayawardena [mailto:hirantha@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 12:40 AM To: [ExchangeList] http://www.MSExchange.org/ Hi! Expertise, I'm planning to hookup another exchange 2000 server, with disaster recovery in mind. So I read some Microsoft articles with related to disaster recovery specially - Disaster recovery exchange 2000.pdf article. What they say is you have to have 6 hard disks. Unfortunately I do not have much $$$$ . so my plan is to have a 2 SCSI Drivers - 18GB each and 1 IDE Hard Drive - 40GB, and the hard disk partition scheme is.. FDisk 1 (IDE HD) - Driver C: (Fat16)-windows 2000 boot files and Active drive, 100MB Primary partition - Drive d: (NTFS) - windows 2000 operating system files and swap files Remaining capacity Extended Partition FDisk 2 (SCSI) - Drive E: (NTFS) - Exchange 2000 files and additional server applications, 100% full extended partition FDisk 3 (SCSI) - Drive F: (NTFS) - transaction log files and database files. 100% full extended partition Can I know from you all is this disk partition setups are ok! This will give low performance due to use of the IDE HD????????? Or this is not the way.. Thank you in advance Hirantha Wijayawardena ICT Co-ordinator Crescat Developments limited Mobile: 94-(0)72-2440308 Tel: 94-(0)75-540404 Ext.221 www.crescatcity.com ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: mark@xxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub') ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSExchange.org Discussion List as: hirantha@xxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')