RE: Body missing from email
- From: Jabber Wock <jabberwock99@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:25:58 -0500
Hi,
I am curious because I have heard others say this too, but have never quite
understood it. I can see why isinteg might destroy a database that is
already suspect or damaged. But what I am not clear on is: why would
isinteg damage a perfectly healthy database? Is that a fact or an urban
legend? Is isinteg really that flaky? Would Microsoft have released it or
be recommending it's use if that were so?
best regards
JW
On 12/9/05, ChongJa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ChongJa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> http://www.MSExchange.org/
>
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> You could, it may or may not fix the problem. The isinteg will find
> inconsistencies and and try to fix orphaned messages attachments... Keep in
> mind though that isinteg should only be run when there is indication of
> corruption whether through event logs or other means. Running isinteg on a
> healthy db can actually do harm.
>
Other related posts:
