RE: Body missing from email

  • From: Jabber Wock <jabberwock99@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 16:25:58 -0500


I am curious because I have heard others say this too, but have never quite
understood it.  I can see why isinteg might destroy a database that is
already suspect or damaged.  But what I am not clear on is:  why would
isinteg damage a perfectly healthy database?  Is that a fact or an urban
legend?  Is isinteg really that flaky?  Would Microsoft have released it or
be recommending it's use if that were so?

best regards

On 12/9/05, ChongJa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <ChongJa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> You could, it may or may not fix the problem. The isinteg will find
> inconsistencies and and try to fix orphaned messages attachments... Keep in
> mind though that isinteg should only be run when there is indication of
> corruption whether through event logs or other means. Running isinteg on a
> healthy db can actually do harm.

Other related posts: