It would be great if we could have a forum where we could discuss equipment
pros and cons.
There may certainly be differences in quality and durability of equipment,
but for me clinical utility is also important
Lesley
From: tanju surmeli <neuropsychiatry@xxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [esnr] Re: an interesting week for neurofeedback Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 02:23:13 -0700 (PDT)
Yes I and some other people brought up the same issue at the think tank meeting.
Tanju
Marco Congedo <loretabiofeedback@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Thats great!
(I am just sorry it was done with Brainmaster.... there is much finer equipment around.)
By the way, some time ago I proposed that SAN could take agreements with selected companies to officially support excellent hardware and software equipments. This could be a quick way to find some money, e.g., for the conference, and also to standardize a little bit the equipment arena and, above all, provide a clear orientation to those entering the NF field.
Has this been discussed, by any chance, by the board?
Marco
Joe Siri Ekgren <joe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: - and Seija Sirviö, SAN boardmember, has just completed the recording of a 25 min documentary on Neurofeedback demonstrating Brainmaster equipment , and testimonials from a happy client, to be shown on national TV in Finland end of November!
Joe
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!