Ist meine email nicht angekommen? Orit ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wolfgang Keeser" <wolfgangkeeser@xxxxxxx> To: <esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, July 11, 2004 12:08 AM Subject: [esnr] Re: Summary Board Meeting > orit meine private email adresse ist: > Dr. Wolfgang Keeser > schawua tov! > wolfgang > Am 10.07.2004 um 20:10 schrieb Dr Orit Sodemann: > > > Wolfgang, koennte ich eine private email Adresse bekommen? Ich habe > > eine > > Frage, die nicht auf die Liste gehoert. > > Orit > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Wolfgang Keeser" <wolfgangkeeser@xxxxxxx> > > To: <esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 8:15 PM > > Subject: [esnr] Re: Summary Board Meeting > > > > > >> Orit, great! Could you email us (board_ESNR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) a bit > >> about your clinical background. I will presumably be in Israel in > >> september, where we could meet. > >> > >> Wolfgang Keeser > >> Am 09.07.2004 um 18:22 schrieb Dr Orit Sodemann: > >> > >>> I am interested to be a member of the Training course Committee. > >>> Best regards > >>> Orit Sodemann > >>> > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Gruzelier, John H" <j.gruzelier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> To: <esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:40 PM > >>> Subject: [esnr] Summary Board Meeting > >>> > >>> > >>> Summary of the Board Meeting of 7th July. > >>> > >>> The Board met by telelink and this is a summary of main issues and > >>> the > >>> proposal for the Vote on the Referendum concerning changes to the > >>> Bye-laws. > >>> We particularly focussed on issues that members have raised on the > >>> List and > >>> it is these that are summarised here. > >>> > >>> > >>> Training Course and Call for Committee members. > >>> > >>> We have decided not to proceed with the basic component 1 of the > >>> Training > >>> course in 2004. We plan instead to hold a Think Tank to thoroughly > >>> discuss > >>> issues such as qualifications of trainees, curriculum, diverse > >>> streams, etc, > >>> including all the matters that have arisen on the List with reference > >>> to > >>> Training and Certification as part of the Aims of the Society. > >>> This will be held in London or thereabouts in September and we hope > >>> that all > >>> members with a commitment to these issues will join the Board and > >>> attend and > >>> help with the process. It may be held in a university Hall of > >>> Residence to > >>> provide affordable accommodation. > >>> The outcome will be posted on the List for further discussion. > >>> Tentative dates are 17,18 September. > >>> We note that this delay in no way alters our prioritising this matter > >>> as one > >>> of extreme importance. This is not a recipe for vacillation and > >>> inaction. > >>> Further Members of the Training course Committee are sought. > >>> > >>> European and International Membership. > >>> > >>> The focus of the Society is European with predominantly European > >>> concerns. > >>> At the same time we see no reason to restrict membership to > >>> Europeans. > >>> (I > >>> belong to several US societies as an ordinary member, to give an > >>> example). > >>> At no time have we had the intention of setting up an international > >>> society > >>> to rival iSNR. However, we do have every intention of encouraging > >>> international attendance at our meetings, and involving > >>> 'international' > >>> teachers on our training courses. This will be to the advantage of > >>> the > >>> field in general. > >>> Stating our aim as an international society was done in draft 2 of > >>> the > >>> Aims, > >>> in the service of parsimony, but this has led to some members > >>> imputing > >>> aims > >>> that were not intended. In order to avoid such misunderstanding the > >>> aim > >>> will be restated as 'a European society which is open to > >>> international > >>> membership.' > >>> Members of the Board, without exception have an international vision > >>> for the > >>> scientific and clinical aims of the society, as a society of applied > >>> neuroscience, and one which is complimentary to I-SNR. > >>> > >>> Referendum and Vote on changes to the Bye-laws. > >>> > >>> The List was set up to facilitate discussion about the referendum on > >>> the 6th > >>> June. At the same time the proposed changes to the Bye-laws were > >>> posted on > >>> the web along with the existing Bye-laws. It is now proposed to set > >>> a > >>> date > >>> for voting on the changes to the Bye-laws; aside from the issue of > >>> international versus Europe which is being addressed. This date has > >>> been set > >>> as 21st July. > >>> > >>> Bye-Laws and Aims of the Society. > >>> > >>> The Bye-laws and the Aims of the Society are being confused. Perhaps > >>> this > >>> is largely because we posted them at the same time. The Aims of a > >>> Society > >>> are always evolving. Our Bye-laws in their scope and detail are very > >>> very > >>> similar to those of other comparable societies. Bye-laws of > >>> scientific > >>> societies do not go into detail over membership qualifications, > >>> training > >>> courses, certification issues, etc. These procedures are set up by > >>> societies, but do not form part of the Bye-laws. At a practical > >>> level > >>> societies would never get started if all such issues were to be > >>> somehow > >>> determined in advance. > >>> > >>> Membership Status > >>> > >>> All members will be members of both SAN and I-SNR until such time as > >>> dues > >>> are paid directly to SAN following the Referendum outcome. > >>> > >>> The List. > >>> > >>> The List will serve as a valuable service in promoting discussion > >>> about all > >>> aspects of how the Society should function, aside from the AGM. It > >>> will con > >>> tinue to serve this function, as the range of issues is expanded. > >>> Members > >>> are encouraged to express their opinions. > >>> > >>> Annual Meeting. > >>> > >>> The Board is proposing a meeting in 2005, possibly in May. Currently > >>> a > >>> central location is being sought. > >>> > >>> John Gruzelier > >>> > >>> President > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > >