[esnr] Re: AW: Re: Standardised Equipment

  • From: "Berrie Gerrits" <praktijkgerrits@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 19:56:19 +0200

Piano, piano Marco,

 I believe in second chances, even if a big group has the same experiences with 
one company (and as you know, I am amongst those who has had several 
disappointing exp. with several companies).

I think step one would be technical standards concerning hard and software.
Step two: what was the service in the past?
Step three: what are the manufacturers going to do with bad experiences and 
what GARANTEES are they offering for better service in the future ?

 Power to the consumers !! Ogni consumenti ha il diretto de servicio maximale 
(this is improvised Italian  ;-). Ciao ciao

Met vriendelijke groet/All the best/Ciao,

Berrie Gerrits

Psychologenpraktijk Gerrits
Sloetstraat 14
6524 AS  Nijmegen
Tel: 024-3235053

Neurofeedback en QEEG gecertificeerd (AAPB CR)
BIG geregistreerd (GZ en psychotherapie)

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Marco Congedo 
  To: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:58 PM
  Subject: [esnr] Re: AW: Re: Standardised Equipment

  Excellent suggestion. Indeed the efficacy of the support should be an 
important factor in selecting a software/hardware provider. This should be 
based on past experience of customers, since, as latin said, verba volant! 
(words "fly").

  Unfortunately, but interestingly enough, if one would give high priority to 
this criterion, most apparently succesful companies (and among them three well 
known "european" hardware companies) should be excluded a priori!


  Ralph Warnke <ralph.warnke@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    That is also an experience I could not agree more with: There are a number 
of good systems out there (and some not so good ones). But the most important 
aspect in my eyes is a profound local and international support from the 
provider as ALL systems require assistence when getting started and to achieve 
superb results in due course. So I would like to second Melissa´s broader 
approach in this respect.

    Best regards,
    Mit herzlichen Grüßen
    aus der Wedemark

    (Ralph Warnke)
    MediTECH Electronic GmbH
    Langer Acker 7
    D-30900 Wedemark
    Telefon: 05130 - 97778-0
    Telefax: 05130 - 97778-22
    -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
    Von: esnr-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:esnr-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Foksfam@xxxxxxx
    Gesendet: Montag, 11. Oktober 2004 12:27
    An: esnr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Betreff: [esnr] Re: Standardised Equipment

    In a message dated 11/10/2004 11:21:02 GMT Daylight Time, 
Doklein@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
      my vision would be: recommendations for minimum requirements of 
equipment-features - but neutral resp. products. 

    I think both are needed - a specification of minimum requirements, which 
may be common to several systems - but also a specific product recommendation 
in order to obtain best prices, funding and support from a committed provider.


  Do you Yahoo!?
  vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today!

Other related posts: