FYI --- Mona El-Haddad <m.elhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Mona El-Haddad" <m.elhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <m.elhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Nov 14, 28 & Dec 12: IES/GOEHU Environment > & Health seminars > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:09:12 -0500 > > Institute for Environmental Studies & > Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit > ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH SEMINAR SERIES: Thursdays at > 4:00 p.m. > Room 113, Koffler Institute for Pharmacy Management > 569 Spadina Ave., at Bancroft Ave., north of College > St. > > > For a map and updates, please see > http://www.utoronto.ca/env/seminars/e > <http://www.utoronto.ca/env/seminars/e&h-fall.html> > &h-fall.html > > No registration required ? all are welcome. > > For more information, please contact > Mona El-Haddad (416-978-6526; > <mailto:m.elhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxx> > m.elhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxx) > > THU NOVEMBER 14 2002 > Michael Jerrett, Assistant Professor, School of > Geography and Geology, > McMaster University > Spatial analysis of the air pollution-mortality > association in the > context of ecologic confounders > Lack of control for confounding by ecological > covariates that may relate > to sulfate air pollution and mortality was a key > criticism of the two > studies that were the focus of the Particle > Reanalysis Project. To > assess the validity of this criticism, the following > question was > addressed: ?Does sulfate air pollution exert health > effects when the > impact of other individual and ecologic variables > thought to influence > health is taken into account?? A related question > arises from the > possibility of autocorrelation in the mortality > risks and ecologic > covariates. Failure to control for autocorrelation > can lead to false > positive significance tests and may indicate bias > resulting from a > missing variable or group of variables. > More than 25 individual risk factors and 20 > ecologic variables > representing environmental, socioeconomic, > demographic, health care and > lifestyle determinants of health were controlled in > a two-stage > multilevel analysis. Four modeling strategies were > used to control for > spatial autocorrelation. Of the 20 ecologic > variables tested, only > sulfate and sulfur dioxide were significant in > models that incorporate > spatial autocorrelation. Accounting for > autocorrelation also reduces > the size and certainty of the sulfate effect on > mortality when compared > to results generated from Cox models where > independent observations are > assumed. Confidence limits for the sulfate relative > risk include unity > in models that simultaneously control for sulfur > dioxide and > autocorrelation. > > REMAINING FALL SEMINARS: > THU NOVEMBER 28 2002 > Gary Liss, Assistant Professor, Department of Public > Health Sciences and > Gage Occupational and Environmental Health Unit, > University of Toronto; > Medical Consultant, Ontario Ministry of Labour > Comparison of medically unexplained symptoms between > radiographers and > physiotherapists > Medical radiation technologists (radiographers or > MRTs) may develop > occupational asthma and a poorly characterized > condition known as > ?darkroom disease?. MRTs have exposure to > irritating and sensitizing > chemicals involved in developing and fixing films > including > glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, acetic acid and SO2. > It is unknown > whether previous investigations of MRTs have > included questionnaire > items regarding their ?sensitivities? to chemicals, > used to define > multiple chemical sensitivities (MCS), also known as > idiopathic > environmental illness (IEI). A questionnaire survey > was conducted to > ascertain, among MRTs as compared with a control > group of > physiotherapists, the prevalence of > physician-diagnosed asthma, > respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms, as well as > responses to items > previously proposed by Kipen (2000) and Kreutzer > (1999) to identify > those possibly having chemical sensitivities. > Responses were analyzed > among 1110 MRTs and 1523 physiotherapists who never > smoked. Findings > from the exposure assessment in a sample of > darkrooms will be presented, > as well as the results comparing reported asthma, > respiratory and > non-respiratory symptoms, and the proportions of > each profession meeting > these MCS/ IEI definitions. Possible interpretation > and mechanisms of > the findings will also be discussed. This study was > supported by a > grant from the Research Advisory Council of the > Workplace Safety & > Insurance Board. Collaborators included Susan > Tarlo, Jim Purdham, Jamie > Doherty, Mickey Kerr, Justina Greene and Lisa > McCaskell. > THU DECEMBER 12 2002 ***NEW SEMINAR ADDED*** > Tor Norseth, Senior Physician, National Institute of > Occupational Health > and Professor of Preventive Occupational Medicine at > the Faculty of > Medicine, Dept of General Practice and Community > Medicine, Oslo, Norway. > > Nickel Refining at the Kola Peninsula, Russia: a > health hazard to the > public? > Pollution from the Russian nickel refining industry > in the cities of > Nikel and Zapolyarny close to the Norwegian border > has been a matter of > great concern during the last decade. A > comprehensive collaborative > Norwegian-Russian monitoring and research programme > on environmental > pollution and pollution effects was started in 1988 > and revealed harmful > effects on the environment on both sides of the > border, but few studies > have until recently concentrated on human health. > The one-hour WHO guideline level of 350 ug/m3 of > SO2 has frequently > been exceeded, specifically on the Russian side of > the border. During > short time SO2 pollution episodes, the maximum > one-hour concentrations > could reach levels as high as 3000 ug/m3 and 4000 > ug/m3 on the Norwegian > and Russian side, respectively. These levels may > cause acute respiratory > distress in asthmatics and naturally cause much > concern among the public > in the border area. The increasing vegetation > damage, of course most > conspicuous in close proximity to the plants, > naturally added to the > concern. So did the gradually opening up of the > border, which had been > virtually closed since the second world war because > of the extensive > Russian military installation in the area. People > could see what > happened to the environment. > In Sør-Varanger on the Norwegian side of the > border, a movement > called ?Stop The Death Clouds? was established in > 1990. Soon after that, > as many as 4000 people had joined the movement, > corresponding to more > than one member per household in the community. The > movement also had > Russian members. The gradual opening of the border > had interesting > effects. The organization did indeed put a > considerable pressure on the > Norwegian government to finance the renovation of > the Nikel smelter. > Health was included in the bilateral monitoring > programme in 1992 > because of the increasing concern for human health > in the area. > Cross-sectional population-based studies with a > common protocol were > started in Sør-Varanger municipality (Norway) and in > Nickel and > Zapolyarny (Russia) in 1994/95. Comparison studies > were performed in > Tromsø (Norway) and in Apatity, Kirovsk and Umba in > Russia. > In his presentation Dr. Norseth will report on > methodological > peculiarities caused by performing a > population-based study in a > population not entirely happy by receiving ?official > letters? caused by > bad experience with such letters. He will, however, > also report on very > fruitful collaboration crossing cultural borders. > Lung diseases, > allergy and pregnancy outcomes are important > problems, and he will give > you some thoughts and reflections on science, values > and politics by > comparing the principles of the populations based > survey they applied in > the Norwegian-Russian collaboration with what he > experienced with the > risk assessment paradigm used in the Port Colborne > case. > > ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca