Re: packaging emel for ubuntu
- From: <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 12:33:32 +1100
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:44:00 +0100
Liviu Andronic <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > no 'internal' use of imagemagick, maybe for icon resizing?
> >
> Seems so. I tried to remove imagemagick from the build deps, and the
> build process failed right towards the end:
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/emelfm2-0.8.0'
> convert icons/emelfm2_32.png debian/emelfm2.xpm
> make: convert: Command not found
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 127
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>
>
> > udisks for WITH_UDISKS=1
> > WITH_DEVKIT is deprecated
> > libdbus-glib-1-dev is needed only for glib < 2.26
> >
> It is a bit complicated to specify conditional dependencies in
> 'debian/control', so I was wondering whether it was an issue if both
> libdbus-glib-1-dev and glib >= 2.26 are available at build time?
No. libdbus-glib is simply irrelevant.
(Both
> libdbus-glib-1-dev and glib < 2.26 are present on Lucid, but
> libdbus-glib-1-dev and glib >= 2.26 would be available on Maverick and
> later.)
>
> As for WITH_POLKIT=1, what build-
None
/run-time
Default command for "run command as root" becomes pkexec
dependencies are expected?
> In Makefile.config I see "Requires polkit, which in turn seems to need
> gio >= 2.22." However, I removed all libpolkit-related development
> files and emel still compiled just fine with WITH_POLKIT=1. Am I doing
> something wrong?
No
Regards
Tom
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts:
