Re: fdatasync() vs. fsync()

  • From: <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 10:04:03 +1100

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008 15:32:21 +0200
Marcus von Appen <mva@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I wonder about the fdatasync() call in plugins/e2p_crypt.c. Does the
> module need or relies on real-time behaviour? If not, could fsync() be
> used instead? This would allow operating systems not supporting the POSIX
> real-time specs to use it as well ;-).
Without knowing precisely the difference between flushing file-saves in real 
time or otherwise, on the face of it the change is ok. Now in svn.


Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to 
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by 
logging into the web interface.

Other related posts: