emelFM2 Ubuntu PPA
- From: Liviu Andronic <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:45:39 +0100
Great, it looks good. The PPA is up and running. [1] Since the Ubuntu
binaries are hopelessly outdated, it would be nice to have the PPA
listed on emelfm2.net.
For those running Ubuntu and reading this post, it would be great if
you could provide some feedback regarding these packages.
Cheers
Liviu
[1] https://launchpad.net/~landronimirc/+archive/emelfm2
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:26 PM, <tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:14:55 +0100
> Liviu Andronic <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> I ended up with the following build-time deps:
>> Build-Depends: libglib2.0-dev, libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.6), imagemagick,
>> debhelper (>= 7), quilt (>= 0.46-7~), libmagic-dev, libgtkspell-dev
>> (>= 2.0.14), udisks, libdbus-glib-1-dev, libacl1-dev
>>
>> Does anything look strange to you? I'm also hesitating: is 'udisks' a
>> build-time requirement, or is it only needed at run-time?
>
> Runtime only.
>
>>
>>
>> As for the run-time deps, here's the resulting list (when built against
>> Lucid):
>> Depends: libacl1 (>= 2.2.11-1), libc6 (>= 2.4), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4),
>> libdbus-glib-1-2 (>= 0.78), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.23.5), libgtk2.0-0 (>=
>> 2.20.0), libgtkspell0 (>= 2.0.15), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.18.0),
>> libmagic1
>> Recommends: libbz2-1.0 | liblzo2-2, grep (>= 2.5.3), sed (>= 4.1.5),
>> udisks, policykit-1
>> Suggests: tracker-utils
>>
>> Again, does anything seem queer to you? I'm specifically thinking of
>> 'tracker-utils': even though it's not needed at build-time, does emel
>> still interact with it at run-time? Should I Suggest or Recommend
>> 'tracker-utils' when building with WITH_TRACKER=1?
>
> Yes to both.
>
>>
>>
>> Last, below are the Makefile.config options that I'm tweaking at build-time:
>> MAKEOPTS = \
>> WITH_KERNELFAM=1 \
>> NEW_COMMAND=1 \
>> EDITOR_SPELLCHECK=1 \
>> WITH_LATEST=1 \
>> WITH_THUMBS=1 WITH_THUMBLIB=0 \
>> WITH_TRACKER=1 \
>> WITH_ACL=1 \
>> WITH_POLKIT=1 \
>> WITH_UDISKS=1
>>
>> Are these sensible default for a modern Linux distro? Specifically,
>> Is WITH_KERNELFAM=1 and USE_INOTIFY=1 the preferred file polling method?
>
> Yes
>
>> Is WITH_UDISKS=1 preferred over WITH_HAL=1?
>
> Yes. HAL is deprecated, sooner or later distros will omit it.
>
> Regards
> Tom
>
>
> --
> Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
> emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
> logging into the web interface.
--
Do you know how to read?
http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm
http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reader
Do you know how to write?
http://garbl.home.comcast.net/~garbl/stylemanual/e.htm#e-mail
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts:
