Re: RELEASE emelFM2 0.2
- From: Florian Zähringer <Flo.Zaehringer@xxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:29:57 +0200
Hi!
The problem is the changelog file.
Seems like Tom forgot to update this. No big deal.
Just add the lines
emelfm2 (0.2.0-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream
-- Florian Zaehringer <flo.zaehringer@xxxxxx> Thu, 26 Aug 2006 20:03:20 -0400
on top. And it should label as 0.2
Cheers,
-- Florian
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:08:41 -0400
dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > In summary, relative to 0.1.8:
> >
> > * a variety of fine-tunes of the user-interface
> > * several small operational changes
> > * updated translations
> > * bugs fixed (the more serious ones were all done in the 0.1.8 patch)
> >
> > See http://emelfm2.net/ChangeLog for details.
> >
> > Three candles. Well, almost. Version 0.0.1 of emelFM2 was released on 6
> > September 2003.
> >
> > Three years have included 18 official releases and 12 or 13 pre-releases,
> > so maybe the speed is not so bad. We must do something about the numbering
> > scheme, if we are to get to 1.0 this lifetime !
> >
> > These days, the general shape and feel of emelFM2 is fairly stable.
> > Presumably there will be bugs to find and fix, but probably no more
> > significant change. A possible exception, the addition of vfs capability
> > (in essence, the ability to show things other than mounted local
> > directories in file-lists) is presently classed among the "changes that may
> > not be worth the effort". More on this in another message.
> >
> > Regards
> > Tom
> >
> >
> Another fine release! I am having a little trouble making a deb package
> for this release. That's not completely accurate; I can make the deb
> package just fine with sudo debian/rules binary, and it installs fine
> too. The problem I am having is the package that gets built is
> emelfm2_0.1.8-1_i386.deb. The about dialog shows the version correctly
> as 0.2. I have edited both the /debian/files, and /debian/control files,
> and changed older instances to read 0.2.
> Like I said, it works, and installs just fine, it is the latest version,
> just the deb package is incorrectly mis-labled. Any ideas?
> btw, I don't have this problem using checkinstall to build the deb package.
>
>
>
> --
> David S. Yates
> webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com
> blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog
> podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks/podcast/
>
>
> --
> Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
> emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
> logging into the web interface.
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts:
