tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
is there a reason why KERNEL_FAM=1 is not the default in the Makefile.config?On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 00:19:18 -0500 dsyates <dsyates@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:As happens all too often, we find things to fix right after a release! Not big things, and not worth another release now, but you might as well apply the corrections now. A patch, and instructions for its use, are now available from http://emelfm2.net/OtherDownLoadsAnd I just got through building from svn about an hour ago. :-)Then you're already done! The patch essentially conforms the 0.3.6 release to current svn, plus a couple of other minor things like version no. 0.3.6.1.Is that KERNEL_FAM=1 option still necessary to get around the pane refresh thingy?No. But I'm not sure why anyone would bother to build without KERNEL_FAM=1 (or USE_INOTIFY=1) if they use a recent linux kernel. Regards Tom
-- David S. Yates webpage: http://lottalinuxlinks.com blog: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/blog podcast: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/podcast/ forum: http://lottalinuxlinks.com/forum/ -- Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by logging into the web interface.