Re: 0.1 - FINALLY !

  • From: tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:28:43 +1000

On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:28:28 +0200
Denis Prost <denis.prost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Tom,
> 
> Le vendredi 22 juillet 2005 à  09:31:32
> tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit:
> 
> > > > Something else bad in the build tools ?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > You were right, I did a clean reinstall of my build tools and dev
> > > packages, and now "make" works !
> > 
> > The RUN_ONCE_CHECK macro should also work, without the changes
> > recently suggested ?
> 
> Yes it does !
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > PS : by the way, I noticed emelfm2 was slow updating the number of
> > > selected files in the bottom status bar. Do you have the same
> > > behaviour or have I to search if something is wrong on my system ?
> > 
> > Status line message is updated using a 3-second timeout. That
> > interval will be extended if the app. is "busy'.
> > 
> I understand.  But I think that delay looks strange to the user. Would
> it really produce a CPU overload if it was 1-second instead of 3 ?
IIRC, 3-sec was a compromise between big and little dirs, when the update used 
to overlap the pane refresh process. Probably not so important now.

I'll try out 1.5 secs. You can change E2_FILESCHECK_INTERVAL in emelfm2.h

 Or
> could that delay be configurable ?
Yes, but who would want to worry about that - better if it just works ...

Regards
Tom


--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to 
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by 
logging into the web interface.

Other related posts: