Re: 0.1 - FINALLY !
- From: Denis Prost <denis.prost@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: emelfm2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:48:50 +0200
Le samedi 23 juillet 2005 à 00:28:43
tpgww@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 09:28:28 +0200
> Denis Prost <denis.prost@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > >
> > I understand. But I think that delay looks strange to the user.
> > Would it really produce a CPU overload if it was 1-second instead
> > of 3 ?
> IIRC, 3-sec was a compromise between big and little dirs, when the
> update used to overlap the pane refresh process. Probably not so
> important now.
>
> I'll try out 1.5 secs. You can change E2_FILESCHECK_INTERVAL in
> emelfm2.h
>
1.5 secs would be fine.
> > Or could that delay be configurable ?
> Yes, but who would want to worry about that - better if it just
> works ...
>
You're right !
Regards
Denis
--
Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to
emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by
logging into the web interface.
Other related posts:
