"i challenge anyone (obviously not you) to speak about it"
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 16:42
To: Laertes Papaspyrou; eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Political phase results October
1809
"So far in the whole game, Prussian dignity is untouched. and i challenge
anyone (obviously not you) to speak about it."
If I wanted to be cunning I would urge you to speak to your allies first, but I
would never do this, especially now that you are in the middle of a perfect
collaboration. I think your best defence is what you believe yourself, so why
bother with rumors?
On Tuesday, 19 February 2019, 15:45:53 EET, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
is this tense a little different than the one that calm and wise Spanish ruler
used to have???
only one PS.
Prussia accepted the agreement because of the need to save resources for
fighting France. if not accepted then all these resources would be used to keep
on fighting Spain.
By that time, Spain counted one draw and one defeat with more than 2 corps of
casualties vs. a couple of Prussian factors. With that Spanish performance,
German bookmakers were playing Spain as outsider!
So far in the whole game, Prussian dignity is untouched. and i challenge anyone
(obviously not you) to speak about it.
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 15:36
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: Re: Political phase results October
1809
I'm happy I amuse you and I'm also glad to see you can convince yourself. Get
on with it.
p.s. I think it was Prussia who fought Russia and wouldn't accept anything but
unconditional surrender, etc... Times change for good!
p.s.2 Britain, offered money to save your dignity. We accepted for the same
reason... because I always prefer the middle solution and not the extreme like
you...
On Tuesday, 19 February 2019, 15:25:34 EET, Dimitris Stavr.
<poliorkitis@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
May i share some facts?
* Prussia agreed with Spain, and if i remember well there was direct
communication with Spain
* That time Spain was allied to Russia
* GB paid both Spain and Prussia to conclude this agreement
* Spain accepted the money, hence he "bought" the agreement
* now Spain has changed his relations to Russia (should we had included to
a Spano-Prussian agreement that Spain had remained allied with Russia??? -
interesting, maybe next time)
* now GB has changed his relations with Russia as well and declared to
Spain, i can see every right to Spain to feel bad about it.
* Now Germans fight vs. France. The Spano-Prussian agreement made in order
for the Germans to have time to fight against France.
Prussia was talking publicly about the Spanish way of thinking, negotiating,
agreeing and acting.
it is really amusing to see how Spain still tries to interpret black to white!
What has made for sure is to make all allies feel back stubbed!
but since Spain has decided to link his fate with France (looooong time ago)
then we see this action as a step closer to a "clear" solution
do your filthy job and let us finish it once and for good!
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Laertes Papaspyrou <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 14:50
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Political phase results October 1809
It is exactly the opposite. Russia was not part of the agreement, so the
declaration from GB is unprovoked. How should I accept as guarantor a nation
that has declared war on me???? I was fully committed to this agreement. Don't
try to twist things to your liking, but this is another sign of your desperate
situation. I wont argue more on this though.
On Tuesday, 19 February 2019, 14:46:46 EET, Yannis Sykamias
<ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We are disappointed that Spain did not remain committed to his agreement. The
British decision to declare war is not relevant to what was agreed between the
respective parties. Therefore we may not remain allied to an unreliable nation.
Austria declines the call
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Laertes Papaspyrou
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 14:19
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Political phase results October 1809
We are really saddened by this unprovoked declaration of war. IT is obvious the
British leader has lost his focus and is making desperate moves. So be it.
Britain was the guarantor of our agreement with Prussia, we therefore conclude
that this declaration negates this agreement.
Spain calls Austria and Turkey to fight on our side!
On Tuesday, 19 February 2019, 14:10:12 EET, Makis Xiroyannis
<makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
B.Declarations of War Step
Great Britain declares war on Spain
C.Call to Allies Step
<pending>
D.Peace Step
<pending?>
E.Creating Alliances Step
N/A
F.Minor Country Control Step
N/A
G.Breaking Alliances Step
<pending>
H.Free State Declaration Step
<pending>
I.Declaration of Combined Movement Step
Prussia-Great Britain-Russia-Austria
