Will Kutuzov reinforce?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 06 June 2019 18:08
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Die Modifiers
+1 for Spain due to cavalry superiority
-1 for Austria due to difference in tactical rating
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PROBE vs DEFEND
ROUND 1
TABLE: 1-1 vs 3-2
ESP roll: 7 (6+1) => CAS: 3 factors (5% of 54), MRLS: 0.8
AUS roll: 4 (5-1) => CAS: 1 factor (10% of 11), MRLS: 1.4
53 factors with 1.5 MRL vs 8 factors with 2.2 MRL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
REINFORCEMENT
Davout arrives with 13inf and 3 cav
69 factors (of which 13cav) with 1.5 MRL vs 8 factors with 2.2 MRL
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ROUND 2
TABLE: 3-1 vs 3-1
ESP roll: 3 (2+1) => CAS: 4 factors (5% of 69), MRLS: 0.5
AUS roll: 4 (5-1) => CAS: 1 factor (10% of 8), MRLS: 0.8
68 factors with 0.7 MRL vs 4 factors with 1.7 MRL
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf
of Makis Xiroyannis <makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: 06 June 2019 17:01
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Davout also reinforces
ok we wait confirmation
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:53 PM Yannis Sykamias
<ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
If it is my decision Kutusov will reinforce, but I would propose to wait a
while for the Czar on this.
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 3:51:56 PM
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Yes
https://www.infoencrypt.com/safe/lCfZ4ARSm3F74mD9q
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Yannis Sykamias <ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 06 June 2019 16:44
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Have you sent your decision?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 3:41:14 PM
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
You are allies and you're asking us? :p
Technically speaking, it's his decisions but I honestly don't mind...
Corrected the 1 militia factor.
Spanish Forces
IV (9inf)
V (14inf/2cav)
VIII (14inf/2cav)
Cavalry Corps (2cav)
Portugal Corps (8inf/2cav)
French Besieged factors (1inf/1mil)
54factors (of which 10cav) with 2.9MRL°
°[(10*2 + 43*3 + 1*4 = 153 (/54 = 2,833 -> 2.9)]
Austrian Forces
IX (10inf, 1mil)
11factors with 3MRL°°
°°(32/11=2.909 -> 3)
Die Modifiers
+1 for Spain due to cavalry superiority
-1 for Austria due to difference in tactical rating
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PROBE vs DEFEND
ROUND 1
TABLE: 1-1 vs 3-2
ESP roll: 7 (6+1) => CAS: 3 factors (5% of 54), MRLS: 0.8
AUS roll: 4 (5-1) => CAS: 1 factor (10% of 11), MRLS: 1.4
53 factors with 1.5 MRL vs 8 factors with 2.2 MRL
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Yannis Sykamias <ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 06 June 2019 16:36
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Ok!
Regarding morale it is round up Makis!
May I decide for kutusov or we need Dimitris (Ru) on this?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Makis Xiroyannis
<makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:makis.xiroyannis@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 3:37:06 PM
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Yes there is a reason, our dear Sultan is new to this warfare thing and gets
overexcited
First of all, France has only ONE infantry to sent to battle, not one infantry
AND 1 militia. Total is 54. You need 55 to make this battle trivial.
Secondly, morale rounds towards the closest digit. Therefore Spanish morale is
2.8 not 2.9
The battle is ready for round 2, waiting for Russian decision to reinforce, I
already send my to Turkey
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 4:28 PM T. B.
<scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hmmm, indeed. Pursuit ensues?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Yannis Sykamias <ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ysykamias@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 06 June 2019 16:17
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Re: Battle of Milan
Is there a reason that this battle is not trivial?
________________________________
From: eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of T. B. <scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:scotland_above_all@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 3:13:50 PM
To: eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:eiagreek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [eiagreek] Battle of Milan
Spanish Forces
IV (9inf)
V (14inf/2cav)
VIII (14inf/2cav)
Cavalry Corps (2cav)
Portugal Corps (8inf/2cav)
French Besieged factors (1inf/1mil)
55factors (of which 10cav) with 2.9MRL°
°[(11*2 + 43*3 + 1*4 = 155 (/55 = 2,8181 -> 2.9)]
Austrian Forces
IX (10inf, 1mil)
11factors with 3MRL°°
°°(32/11=2.909 -> 3)
Die Modifiers
+1 for Spain due to cavalry superiority
-1 for Austria due to difference in tactical rating
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
PROBE vs DEFEND
ROUND 1
TABLE: 1-1 vs 3-2
ESP roll: 7 (6+1) => CAS: 3 factors (5% of 55), MRLS: 0.8
AUS roll: 4 (5-1) => CAS: 1 factor (10% of 11), MRLS: 1.4
54 factors with 1.5 MRL vs 8 factors with 2.2 MRL
