[ecop-poct] Re: Spanish leadership criteria

  • From: "Bastida Merino, Leire" <Leire.Bastida@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 08:13:39 +0000

Yes. I agree with you.

Tecnalia Blackberry Service

De: Luigi del Re [mailto:Luigi.delre@xxxxxx]
Enviado: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 10:09 AM
Para: ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Luigi del Re <Luigi.delre@xxxxxx>
Asunto: [ecop-poct] Re: Spanish leadership criteria

I just wonder what happens if every country has similar requirements – we need 
as many WP as countries? And at least twice as many tasks?

Funny requirements…

Luigi


From: ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Leire Bastida Merino
Sent: Dienstag, 29. März 2011 09:31
To: Luigi del Re; ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ecop-poct] Spanish leadership criteria

Dear all,

One of the spanish criteria to be fulfilled is about  leadership. The spanish 
partners should lead, at least:

a) 2 WP
b) 1 WP and 2 tasks
c) 4 tasks

I know that in the PO phase it is difficult to define leaders for WPs and also 
for tasks we have not defined in this phase. But we must try to fulfill this 
criteria. So, my suggestion is to discuss the WP leadership tomorrow at telco. 
Of course, this is only temporary and we can update the leadership of WPs 
during FPP phase.

I would propose Tecnalia to lead WP1: "Development process".

PS: Tomorrow I will not be able to attend to the concall because I am 
travelling, but I have already commented this to Olli. Please, let me know asap 
the conclusion from the concall because I have to include this information in 
part C and sign the document.

Regards,
-Leire-

De: Olli Vistbacka [mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Friday, March 25, 2011 9:57 AM
Para: Bastida Merino, Leire
Asunto: VS: Weekly meeting minutes

Hi Leire,

If I understood you correctly, the Spanish consortium (a member of the Spanish 
consortium) needs to be in lead in


a)      2 WPs AND 2 tasks
OR

b)      1 WP AND 4 tasks

Right?

Where does this requirement originate from? In any case I’m inclined to have 
these kind of discussions in POCT/FPPCT/EP Steering Group, nevertheless given 
that I would have the final decision.

Thanks for bringing this up.

-- Olli

Lähettäjä: Bastida Merino, Leire [mailto:Leire.Bastida@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Lähetetty: 24. maaliskuuta 2011 17:26
Vastaanottaja: Olli Vistbacka
Aihe: RE: Weekly meeting minutes

Hi Olly,

Just another comment One of the criteria for Spanish partners is to al least 
leads: 2 WP or 1 WP and 2 tasks or 4 tasks.


So, for this phase, we are going to assume that we are going to lead 1 WP and 2 
tasks. The WP would be "WP Development Processes". Later, in FPP where the WPs 
and tasks are better described we will refine this. Is this ok for you? Now on 
PO we do  not need to define WP leaders in the proposal.



Regards,

-Leire-


De: Olli Vistbacka [mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx]
Enviado el: Thursday, March 24, 2011 2:56 PM
Para: Bastida Merino, Leire
Asunto: VS: Weekly meeting minutes

Lets assume 1.1.2012 and 36 months

br, Olli

Lähettäjä: Bastida Merino, Leire [mailto:Leire.Bastida@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Lähetetty: 24. maaliskuuta 2011 15:53
Vastaanottaja: Olli Vistbacka
Aihe: RE: Weekly meeting minutes

Hi Olly,

In order to prepare the Part C we need to know the start date for the the 
proposal and also the duration.

Thank you very much.

Regards,
-Leire-

De: ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] En 
nombre de Olli Vistbacka
Enviado el: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 2:54 PM
Para: ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [ecop-poct] Weekly meeting minutes

Hi,

Today’s minuted can be found in the Dropbox.

--
Olli Vistbacka
Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.)

Phone +358 40 569 1043
olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.hermia.fi/in_english/

Other related posts: