Dear All, I did just upload "new" PO section 2 into Dropbox which is basically text from PLATINO PO. We are working on making the text better and shorter (max # of pages is: 2-2.5 pages) I have two questions: - Since Ecopremises is about mobile machines which are "car" like vehicle the evaluators did and will ask Platino/Ecopremises relationship to AUTOSAR. How this issues is best explained since I'm not sure if we did good job last time? - Also, we have understood, that Artemis project would like see that new projects (like Ecopremises) are built on existing Artemis projects. And therefore we "used" GENESYS as a base for Platino. Should we still do so or drop it? Cheers, -J Jouni Mattila Professor in Machine Automation, Dr. Tech. TUT/IHA Korkeakoulunkatu 6 P.O. Box 589 FI-33101 Tampere, Finland Mobile +358-40-8490244 Fax +358-3-31152240 Email: jouni.mattila@xxxxxx www.iha.tut.fi From: ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olli Vistbacka Sent: 17. maaliskuuta 2011 12:17 To: ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [ecop-poct] Weekly meeting minutes Hi, Unfortunately I wasn't able to complete the minutes yesterday, but the minutes are now in the Dropbox. Sorry for the delay. * I added an extra action point about Sensortecnic Wiedermann, which not discussed in the actual meeting. * Please take a note that all the communication concerning the PO and whole consortium is requested to be done using POCT-mail list exclusively in order to maximize information sharing and comments * A statement was made about the minimum contribution guidelines for each partner (In the end of minutes) br, -- Olli Vistbacka Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.) Phone +358 40 569 1043 olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.hermia.fi/in_english/