[ecop-poct] New PO section 2. uploaded

  • From: Mattila Jouni <jouni.mattila@xxxxxx>
  • To: "ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 14:23:37 +0200

Dear All,

I did just upload "new" PO section 2 into Dropbox which is basically text from 
PLATINO PO. We are working on making the text better and shorter (max # of 
pages is: 2-2.5 pages)

I have two questions:

-          Since Ecopremises is about mobile machines which are "car" like 
vehicle the evaluators did and will ask Platino/Ecopremises relationship to 
AUTOSAR. How this issues is best explained since I'm not sure if we did good 
job last time?

-          Also, we have understood, that Artemis project would like see that 
new projects (like Ecopremises) are built on existing Artemis projects. And 
therefore we "used" GENESYS as a base for Platino. Should we still do so or 
drop it?



Jouni Mattila
Professor in Machine Automation, Dr. Tech.
Korkeakoulunkatu 6
P.O. Box 589
FI-33101 Tampere, Finland
Mobile +358-40-8490244
Fax    +358-3-31152240
Email: jouni.mattila@xxxxxx

From: ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ecop-poct-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Olli Vistbacka
Sent: 17. maaliskuuta 2011 12:17
To: ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ecop-poct] Weekly meeting minutes


Unfortunately I wasn't able to complete the minutes yesterday, but the minutes 
are now in the Dropbox. Sorry for the delay.

*         I added an extra action point about Sensortecnic Wiedermann, which 
not discussed in the actual meeting.

*         Please take a note that all the communication concerning the PO and 
whole consortium is requested to be done using POCT-mail list exclusively in 
order to maximize information sharing and comments

*         A statement was made about the minimum contribution guidelines for 
each partner (In the end of minutes)

Olli Vistbacka
Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.)

Phone +358 40 569 1043

Other related posts: