Hi, In order to provide evaluators as readable and understandable PO as possible, I feel that all the partner roles should be categorized somehow in section 5 - 5.1 consortium as a whole. It would make the text more compact and provide a simplified overall picture of the consortium composition. It would also give us the whole consortium-wise as well as contry-wise an overall picture of who's doing what and are there too much overlaps or missing elements. In addition to role category, each partner should have in the table a short elaborative description of its responsibilities. I drafted a list of categories: Tool suite development Framework development Test & verification Pilot & field test Please comment: - Missing major categories - category descriptions - What should be the level of detail in categories? Should development be broken into sub-categories for instance? br, -- Olli Vistbacka Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.) Phone +358 40 569 1043 olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.hermia.fi/in_english/