[ecop-poct] Categorizing partner roles - comments requested
- From: Olli Vistbacka <olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:55:16 +0000
Hi,
In order to provide evaluators as readable and understandable PO as possible, I
feel that all the partner roles should be categorized somehow in section 5 -
5.1 consortium as a whole. It would make the text more compact and provide a
simplified overall picture of the consortium composition. It would also give us
the whole consortium-wise as well as contry-wise an overall picture of who's
doing what and are there too much overlaps or missing elements.
In addition to role category, each partner should have in the table a short
elaborative description of its responsibilities.
I drafted a list of categories:
Tool suite development
Framework development
Test & verification
Pilot & field test
Please comment:
- Missing major categories
- category descriptions
- What should be the level of detail in categories? Should development be
broken into sub-categories for instance?
br,
--
Olli Vistbacka
Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.)
Phone +358 40 569 1043
olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx>
http://www.hermia.fi/in_english/
Other related posts:
