[ecop-poct] Categorizing partner roles - comments requested

  • From: Olli Vistbacka <olli.vistbacka@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ecop-poct@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 07:55:16 +0000


In order to provide evaluators as readable and understandable PO as possible, I 
feel that all the partner roles should be categorized somehow in section 5 - 
5.1 consortium as a whole. It would make the text more compact and provide a 
simplified overall picture of the consortium composition. It would also give us 
the whole consortium-wise as well as contry-wise an overall picture of who's 
doing what and are there too much overlaps or missing elements.

In addition to role category, each partner should have in the table a short 
elaborative description of its responsibilities.

I drafted a list of categories:

Tool suite development
Framework development
Test & verification
Pilot & field test

Please comment:
- Missing major categories
- category descriptions
- What should be the level of detail in categories? Should development be 
broken into sub-categories for instance?

Olli Vistbacka
Project Manager, M.Sc. (Eng.)

Phone +358 40 569 1043

Other related posts: