Hi Clare, I have been very disappointed in Peter James, because I found the first few books brilliant and eagerly awaited the next in the series, then he suddenly nose dived for me a few books in and after a couple of stinkers, I stopped reading. Such a shame as I thought the series had a lot to offer, but maybe he just ran out of good plots. Shell. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Clare Gailans" <cgailans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2013 9:01 AM To: <ebooktalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [ebooktalk] My Monthly Reads > Bit late with this. > Peter James: Looking Good Dead. Very exciting, I must progress a bit faster > with this series. Can't remember much about the book a month on, though. > Margaret Atwood: Cat's Eye. This was a re-read for a course we are going on > soon. I enjoyed it more this time because it seemed less hard work with an > audio reader who was in sympathy than in braille first time round. Elaine is > rather hard-faced, and on this reading I found this harder to understand, > because though the experiences with Cordelia were definitely dreadful and > the sort of thing you would expect to mark her for life, she had a very > loving though rather unobservant family who you would think would have > compensated, even without knowing what was going on. Well, I suppose I think > they would have noticed that something was and asked her. > Jean Rhys: Wide Sargasso Sea, for the same course. I loved this, mainly for > the writing about the landscape and some of the characters, though my > longtime hero Mr Rochester doesn't come out of it well. > L. T. Meade: a World of Girls. This is a Victorian school story and rather > melodramatic, with some of the most nauseating baby talk I have ever seen > written out, and an awful lot of it. Three-year-old Nan kept saying "me like > 'oo" among many other things. I enjoyed most of the writing though, and will > return to her, if only because I am now thoroughly gripped by the school > story genre (again!) Perhaps I have entered my second childhood. > E. M. Delafield: Turn Back the Leaves. This was a very dark book about an > old Catholic family who lived in grim isolation under the rule of their > dreadful father, though it did have snatches of humour to remind me that she > could also write about the Provincial Lady. My favourite was one of the > daughters being chastised for putting on a little make-up, which she was > told to remove before Papa saw it. "You may be sure that our Blessed Lady > never used a powder-puff!" > Charlotte M. Yonge: the Clever Woman of the Family. Another piece of > Victoriana, recommended by my school story devoteees but actually about > several families and Rachel's struggle to branch out of the drawing-room > into the world. Things go horribly wrong and she ends up marrying the man > she loves and settling for family life and helping in the parish. Not a > feminist writer, not that this bothers me as I have more or less settled for > family life myself, all these years on. She has some very good disabled > characters in this book, including a blindy, which isn't always the case in > books of this period! > Dorothy Whipple: Greenbanks. This is another family story written in the > 1930s. Persephone have republished quite a few of her books. This was very > good but my favourite is still High Wages, about Jane who makes her way up > from a shop girl to running her own shop, with all sorts of lovely period > detail about the job. > Clare > > >