[duxuser] Re: Help, please!!

  • From: "Deborah Barnes" <dbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 15:26:24 -0500

Thanks, Londa.  It actually did turn out pretty well.

 

Deb B.

 

  _____  

From: duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Londa Peterson
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 2:02 PM
To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [duxuser] Re: Help, please!!

 

Hi Deborah,

 

When I get an rtf document, I bring it up in Word and then save it as a Word
document with a .doc extension.  I bring that file up in Duxbury.  The
resulting document is usually easier to work with than copying and pasting.
Duxbury does not import .rtf files which explains why you got a lot of
garbage when you opened the rtf file in dbt.  Hope this helps a little.

-----Original Message-----
From: duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:duxuser-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On
Behalf Of Deborah Barnes
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 10:36 AM
To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [duxuser] Help, please!!

I have a program that I have to have ready by tomorrow.  It is in rtf
format, and there are tables.  On the left side of the table is the song
name, and at the right is the composer.  So far so good.  What's the best
way to make this work once it's in Duxbury?  I want to maybe preserve the
tables although I can be persuaded to change my mind.  When I saved the rtf
format and then tried to take it into Duxbury, I got all the codes.  When I
copied and pasted-just to see what would happen-I got a pretty good copy but
no table and a few things out of place.  Any ideas?

 

When I copied and pasted and was just playing around with it, I put runovers
in cell 3 and it didn't look bad . so I could go with that but the tables
look kind of fancy .  . only thing is I can't figure out how runovers would
be handled in tables.

 

Thanks,

 

Deb B.

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. duxuser
  3. Archive
  4. 01-2007