Yes! Or if they would even put it out on the web site to download in PDF format and then print out on your own. I could handle that. -----Original Message----- From: Johnathan Detrick [mailto:jdetrick@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:24 PM To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: the Two Towers Exactly! Who want to buy a new rulebook? Not me. What I'd prefer would be a small book that only included the rule changes. But I suppose that would never happen. Damon Kline wrote: > Yes, let's squeeze as much money as possible out of what amounts to mostly > the same material, just reprinted. Gotta love it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: widderslainte [mailto:widderslainte@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 3:14 PM > To: dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: the Two Towers > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:dungeoncrawl-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Grogan, Keith > > Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 14:19 > > To: 'dungeoncrawl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' > > Subject: [dungeoncrawl] Re: the Two Towers > > > > > > > > I just read about this the other night on WotC site. I was > > going to email out to the group as well. Wasn't extensive > > play testing supposed to keep something like this from > > happening? Oh well. So this is 3rd and half edition, or version 3.5:) > > I've heard it's more like 3.1 or 3.25. If you waste time (like I do) on > online message boards, you hear people complaining about the same stuff: > rangers, bards, harm, haste, CR's, attacks of opportunity. The official > 3rd Edition FAQ/Errata document is like 85 pages long. Between Star > Wars, Cthulhu d20, and d20 modern, some of the descriptions and > explanations of rules are "better". I think they also pillaged a few of > the non-WotC d20 products for ideas. I think they may change the Ranger > to allow something like the d20 Modern 'talent trees'. The other rumour > I've heard is they're changing the negative hp stabilization check to > some sort of fortitude save instead of a straight percentage. > Supposedly the core books are due for a new print run this summer > anyways, so they felt it was a good idea. > > Monte Cook is doing something similar, but with completely different > core classes and races. > > S.