On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 23:04:03 +0000 Chris Smith <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Fair enough. I understand the typing thing. I see lots of these "it > must be good as its smaller" arguments which seem spurious. > javascript and css are served as text/javascript and text/css so > surely should be able to be served compressed (removing the > advantage) without any issues? Or am I wrong? You're right of course (even if nothing compresses better than something) - as I said: I'm just lazy. Oh BTW the $() function comes with some additional functionality as well (accepting objects or ids, accepting multiple args and returning an array of elements) Andi