[dokuwiki] Re: Documentation Revision Tool
- From: "YC Chan" <peter.chan.yc@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dokuwiki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 11:46:27 +0200
Hi gerry,
25 Oct 2007 11:18:05 +0200, gerry.w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <
gerry.w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> 1. Write a page following a styleguide (kind of a template?) and have
> this page assigned to another user for review before being published.
> Then customers should be able to rate this page and give comments (I
> think there are plugins for that) so that the page can be re-reviewd.
° No problem to create pages based on templates.
° But all created pages are visible, unless you adjust the Access Control
List. To have a
moderator/first review, you have to create a special namespace with limited
access
so people can 'work it out' before they go public.
° No problem about ratings and comments.
2. After a certain time or event this page has to be found for
> re-(re-*)review by tags, Date ... and the process starts again.
> 3. The procedure has to apply for every kind of media.
>
> The excerpt of questions is:
>
> - Can dokuwiki show me all the pages (not just for one) of a certain age
> at once?
° The index can show pages satifying a criteria (e.g. tags). But to filter
files by age,
somebody has to fiddle with the code to do that (not very difficult though).
- would it be possible to then show Tags or snippets of those pages
>
Currently only snippets can are shown.
I've worked on displaying tags of filtered files in alphabetical order (not
difficult to do).
- Is it possible to show all pages having a combination of Tags
Currently no.
- Can I tag media-files?
No.
- Can I assign pages to a user to be re-reviewed?
DW has no workflow incorporated. Useful addition though!
- Can I connect a wiki page to a svn/cvs source?
Think so, because the pages are files.
So ... thats what I think of at first. If there are no standard
> procedures to what I need I think someone (or me) can write a plugin for
> that ... but before that:
Its Open Source, buddy!
Has anyone an idea on what could be used otherwise or what are the
> procedures at your site to build a documentation that can be fully
> reviewed.
I would look forward to some workflow features into DW. Don't know if it's
already there!
Cheers!
Other related posts:
