On 06/08/2011 12:39 PM, Christopher Smith wrote: > I think the bug is in leaving the writable/updatable file as implied. I was > probably considering lots of files and leaving it so admins could decide how > they would use the cascade. Once set up, there was no real additional > complexity in having two or ten config files. > Rather than impacting on the flexibility to have another config file or five, > I'd go with designating one particular label as the writable config file, > e.g. "local" or the more explicit, "local-writable" Hello, in my wikis and especialy the animals in farming environments I like to be able to restrict all writing of configs to a single directory beeing DOKU_CONF most of the time. Then I set the cascade path according to the directory where the config is written (instead of setting the write directory based on cascade :) I also think selecting the writing location based on cascade would limit possibilities of cascade and per wiki or custom location for config files. regards sam -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://www.dokuwiki.org/mailinglist