> > I would be happy to see a fork of Dillo. I think a significant > > percentage of users would like to see a browser that incorporates a lot > > of new features quickly and is receptive to patches. Of course, that > > means one or two people would need to step up and start making it > > happen. > > > > I personally am willing to help out as I have time, but there's no way I > > could take on a primary developer role. > > > > Paul > > > I'm completely incompetent myself as a developer, but I can add New-Dillo > into a thin client distro (thinstation.sf.net). That will make some > exposure to the project. > > In my biased opinion Thinstation is among the top two Open Source thin > client OSs. > > Any idea if Frank and Indan will settle for this? That's a beginning at least. I don't think more exposure would make any difference. The real issue is that neither Frank nor Indan really wants to be responsible for maintaining a browser project. They have other interesting things to work on in their limited free time. Or maybe I'm putting words in their mouths. I think Indan reads this list... maybe he'll have something to add. Paul ============================================================== The Dillo-Patches mailing list dillo-patches@xxxxxxxxxxxxx List info: //www.freelists.org/list/dillo-patches ==============================================================