[DECtalk], Re: Wonder why Dectalk sings?

  • From: "Jayson Smith" <ratguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <dectalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 05:36:44 -0400

Um, the software dectalk should be able to sing.  Is the problem that you
can't get at the low level of Dectalk to send it the proper commands?  If
so, then the free speak43 program is for you, and yes, you have wasted
money.
Jayson.

----- Original Message -----
From: "DR. JAWS" <dh012e2025@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <dectalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 5:04 AM
Subject: [DECtalk], Re: Wonder why Dectalk sings?


> Hmm. Yeah, when I said any synthesizer can sing, I didn't think of
recorded voices, I was thinking of computer-generated voices.
> I wonder why hardware DECtalks can sing but software DECtalks cannot? It
really annoys me: I've just wasted £60 on a software DECtalk that cannot
even sing!
> E-mail me!
> dh012e2025@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> or visit my web site!
> http://www.horspool.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk
>
> All E-mails from this E-mail address have been scanned for viruses on
send. Matthew Frank Horspool does not except responsibility for viruses in
this or any other message sent by this address. Also notice that if you
happen to send any malicious code it will be blocked by Norton System Works
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jayson Smith
> To: dectalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 2:36 AM
> Subject: [DECtalk], Re: Wonder why Dectalk sings?
>
>
> That's probably right, somebody probably just put the singing in there as
a
> fun toy to play with, figuring nobody would ever do much with it, and
maybe
> it would even get removed when some new, more important feature needed to
be
> added (let's hope that never happens!).
> Now, on to the comments that any synth can sing.  Actually, if I
understand
> everything correctly, the synthesizers that use actual bits of recorded
> human speech can't sing, or if they can it's very contrived.  I'm talking
> about synths like AT&T Natural Voices.  I don't think you can change the
> pitch on that one.  Also, it is true that any synth which has a fine
enough
> pitch control can, by definition, sing.  However, the Dectalk singing is
> actually designed to be used for singing, it has vibrato and all that.
> Whereas, the Blazie notetakers were never designed to sing, and look what
> Jeff Rutkowski pulled off.  However, since it wasn't designed to sing, it
> isn't as good as it would have been if singing had been in the design.
You
> get delays between each syllable, while the synth processes the pitch
change
> commands.
> Jayson.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "shaun everiss" <shaun.e@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <dectalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2004 8:07 PM
> Subject: [DECtalk], Re: Wonder why Dectalk sings?
>
>
> > iNTERESTING JASON
> > i DON'T KNOW, BUT IT PROBABLY WAS A FANCY ADDON TOY.
> > aND i THOUGHT IT WAS.
> > tILL THAT IS YOU GET THE ARCHIVE
> > iTS LIKE STARTREK.
> > iTS JUST TV
> > bUT IT TOOK OFF.
> > sIMULAR TO TE DECTALK SINGING.
> > fIRST THE SYNTH SANG, THEN IT SANG TO MUSIC.
> > tHEN SMART GUYS START USING IT TO CREATE LOADS OF STUFF.
> > aND NOW ITS BIG!
> > dECTALK MAY HAVE STARTED AS SPEECH, BUT IT IS AN INSTRUMENT NOW.
> > At 10:26 p.m. 16/07/2004, you wrote:
> >
> > >I've always wondered something which maybe nobody knows.  Probably
> somebody
> > >does, but they probably aren't on this list.  Why is Dectalk able to
sing
> in
> > >the first place?  I wonder who put that ability there, what purpose it
> was
> > >intended to serve or if it just seemed like a fun thing to do at the
time
> or
> > >whatever.  Maybe when they were designing the Dectalk system they had
> some
> > >extra space left on the rom chip and didn't want it to go to waste.
Who
> > >knows.
> > >Just a thought.
> > >Jayson.
> > >
> > >
> > >---
> > >the DECtalk list.
> > >To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> > >dectalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >and type
> > >unsubscribe
> > >in the subject field.
> > >Moderators email:
> > >shwatscoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >this list's homePage, and the unoficial DECtalk page is at,
> > >http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dectalk
> >
> >
> > ---
> > the DECtalk list.
> > To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> > dectalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > and type
> > unsubscribe
> > in the subject field.
> > Moderators email:
> > shwatscoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > this list's homePage, and the unoficial DECtalk page is at,
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dectalk
>
> ---
> the DECtalk list.
> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> dectalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and type
> unsubscribe
> in the subject field.
> Moderators email:
> shwatscoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> this list's homePage, and the unoficial DECtalk page is at,
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dectalk
>
>
>
> ---
> the DECtalk list.
> To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
> dectalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> and type
> unsubscribe
> in the subject field.
> Moderators email:
> shwatscoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> this list's homePage, and the unoficial DECtalk page is at,
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dectalk

---
the DECtalk list.
To unsubscribe, send a blank message to:
dectalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
and type
unsubscribe
in the subject field.
Moderators email:
shwatscoff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
this list's homePage, and the unoficial DECtalk page is at,
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/dectalk

Other related posts: