I’d agree with Victoria on the translation. Essentially the French says the same thing as the English and it’s not really a debate. Perhaps the debate could be refined to discuss the adequacies of the current strategy? Something like: ‘Can Western countries do anything about the changes to rainy seasons in sub-Saharan African and should they be doing more or is it the responsibility of the people who live in sub-Saharan countries to sort this issue out themselves?’ I’m still working on my debate last week but I’m happy to translate things into French if required (it won’t be 100% perfect of course but I’ll do my very best). Philly On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Alex Helling <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Good Afternoon, > > > > If anyone if fluent in French please > read the most recent debate and see if you can respond at all. I have no > idea if the French is asking the same as the English, would be useful to > know, as Nadia has already mentioned the English version does not really > lend itself to the debate format very well. > http://www.debatewise.com/debates/1396 > > I don’t think I have much more to add except a big general thank you to all > of you for keeping on writing debates for the site, particularly now as > Debatewise HQ is almost totally focused on the Global Youth Panel and > Copenhagen Conference rather than adding content to site. > > > > Thanks, > > Alex > > > > *Debates:* > > > > *Should corrupt officials be banned from travelling to the west?* > > Many dictators amass large amounts of money from the country they rule, > this is either from acquiring tax revenues or from appropriating state > businesses or the natural resources of the state. This damages the country’s > economy in countries that often have large proportions of the population in > poverty while the country’s elite plunder the state’s resources. Nonetheless > these people are not only recognised as being the legitimate government > representing the people of these countries but are allowed to travel where > they like, often spending their resources abroad. Should the west prevent > these officials from visiting? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/4729119.stm > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/us/17visa.html?scp=1&sq=rich%20african%20official&st=cse > > > > *Is Obama rejecting Europe?* > > Europe was worried that George Bush was too warlike and rightwing compared > to most of Europe. However he did engage in his own way, he pursued > partnerships with various European powers; Britain, Spain, Italy as well as > Eastern Europe. He was involved in encouraging Europe to accept Turkey. > Obama may not be at loggerheads with ‘old’ Europe but he does seem to be > ignoring it. Surely the US president should have been there to celebrate the > 20th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. French President Sarkozy > has not yet had an official visit to Washington since Obama took office. > Should Europe be worried about a seeming US preference for a ‘G2’? > > http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=4615 > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/nov/02/obama-europe-relations > > http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2009/10/29/europes_obama_fatigue > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/world/europe/17iht-politicus.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=Europe%20relations&st=cse > > > > *The developed world must commit to agricultural aid of $44bln.* > > A target to eradicate hunger by 2025 seems to be falling by the wayside > along with proposals to spend the $44 billion per year that is needed to > help meet this target. It is not through eternally handing out food to the > needy that we will be able to reduce the hunger in the world it is by > improving the agriculture in those countries that are affected by hunger. We > need to provide the resources to allow them to grow their way out of the > problem. However $44billion is a lot of money, money that many countries, at > the tail end of a recession do not have to spare. > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/world/17food.html?scp=1&sq=agriculture%20africa%20aid&st=cse > > > http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-11-12-food-summit-dilutes-hunger-and-aid-targets > > > > *Gordon Brown not Kevin Rudd should be apologising to those children > forcibly transported to Australia.* > > Australia’s Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has apologised to those who were > forcibly relocated while still children from Britain from the 1920s to the > 1950s to provide a white workforce for the empire and dominions. They were > told their families were dead when they were not and many were abused in > Australian homes. Gordon Brown has said he will apologise in the new year. > It was Britain that committed the greater wrong and should apologise rather > than Australia who were acting as recipient for British Government policy. > Should out current PMs even be apologising for something they had nothing to > do with? > > > http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/australasia/australias-apology-to-transported-children-1779652.html > > > http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/acknowledge-suffering-of-forgotten-kids/story-e6frg6ux-1225798810363 > > > http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6575200/Gordon-Brown-to-apologise-for-Britains-shameful-child-migration-policies.html > > > > *The Republican party needs to broaden its base if it is to regain power.* > > During George Bush’s presidency the Republican Party did not seek to hold a > broad base of support, rather it turned to the right to give it electoral > success. It would mobilise the religious on issues like abortion and > encourage them to vote. The republicans now need to decide if they are to > keep to a far right strategy or move more to the centre, embracing fiscal > conservatives who have been increasingly marginalised in recent years. > > > http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2009/how_can_republicans_repair_their_brand_10751 > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/feb/24/republican-party-personal-responsibility-cpac > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/16/us/politics/16crist.html?scp=2&sq=republican%20party&st=cse > > > > *Should commercial TV stations be allowed to use BBC license fees to pay > for regional news programmes?* > > The BBC gains an immense advantage over commercial TV channels in its > gaining the TV license fee to pay for its programs rather than having to > rely on advertisers. However the other terrestrial TV stations also provide > some public broadcasting, particularly in news programming. ITV is finding > it difficult to justify keeping regional news running but it is a public > good so should the money come out of the BBC’s purse? > > > http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jun/16/digital-britain-bbc-licence-fee > > > http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/media/article6839113.ece > > > http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/tol/arts_and_entertainment/tv_and_radio/article6919507.ece > > > > *Are our railway stations in need of a radical make over?* > > Some of Britain’s railway stations are dilapidated and not fit for purpose, > they are not places you would want to spend any time waiting for your train > at. Signs may not be helpful, with little disabled access and no real time > information to tell you if your train is on time, more needs to be spent to > make stations friendly and accessible. Britain does have some very good > railway stations, for example St Pancras which is a shopping hub as well as > an architectural gem. There is also not an infinite amount of money to pay > for the railways, we need more capacity and faster lines so should money go > there rather than upgrading stations? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8363621.stm > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6920046.ece > > despite the reports having spent a couple of hours in Manchester Victoria > (the times lowest ranked station) waiting for a train towards Leeds a year > ago I thought it was quite nice, large and impressive... sure there were > very few services or people because of that so it was a bit run down, what > do you expect? companies can’t have loads of staff in a station maintaining > it if they have very few trains running from it. > > > > *After an Italian murderer had his sentenced reduced due to having > "violent gene", could DNA profiles be used as a defence in criminal courts? > * > > Walter Perez was murdered for taunting a Muslim man, Abdelmalek Bayout, > about wearing eye makeup. The Murderer was sentenced to nine years. This has > however been reduced because, according to scientists, he possesses five > genes known to be associated with violent behaviour. Should this behavioural > genetics have any influence in court. No matter that he may be predisposed > towards violence this is no reason to murder a stranger for a minor > misdemeanour. > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/genetics/article6919130.ece > > http://www.bioedonline.org/news/news.cfm?art=5784 > > > http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18098-murderer-with-aggression-genes-gets-sentence-cut.html > > > > *Should Qatar be allowed to "buy" their way to hosting the 2022 football > World Cup?* > > Qatar does not seem like an obvious world cup host. The host country needs > to have numerous large high quality stadiums so as to be able to support > numerous matches a day during the first round. Qatar is a small country with > a population of around a million of which only about 350,000 are citizens. > This in turn is could mean problems with a lack of accommodation for > thousands of fans or if they can’t get in then there are not sufficient > numbers of natives to fill the stadiums. Meanwhile there are other > challenges, the world cup is in the middle of summer making a desert country > an unattractive prospect. However Qatar does have one alluring thing, lots > of money – money that can help surmount all the problems, either > geographical or political. > > http://www.worldfootballinsider.com/Story.aspx?id=32710 > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/patrick_barclay/article6916316.ece > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/owen_slot/article6919271.ece > > > > *Does it matter who manages Scotland?* > > Scotland manager George Burley has been sacked after a run of poor > performances by the Scotland team. The SFA decided to fire him after defeats > in friendlys to Japan and Wales with Scotland already having failed to > qualify for the world cup. But who are Scotland kidding, of course we are > likely to meet many defeats, we are a small nation and no matter how big our > passion for the game we can’t overcome the greater range of options for > players that the big teams have. It is not possible to turn a team from a > small country of 5million into world beaters, so does it matter who Scotland > pick as a manager? > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/internationals/8361602.stm > > > http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/more-scottish-football/scotland-job-a-poisoned-chalice-1.932545 > > > http://www.heraldscotland.com/sport/more-scottish-football/the-candidates-to-replace-burley-1.932550 > > p.s. if there are any Scots out on the RRT don’t be offended, I am too, > just engaging in a bit of pessimism! > > > > Use Revisewise @ http://revisewise.debatewise.com/ > > > -- Phillippa Martin-Moran 07813 939 249