[Debatewise RRT] Re: late debates (again)
- From: nadia siddiqi <nadshi@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:41:57 +0200
oh, I hadn't read this:
I make it that Nadia had 90 points to 88, so a close run thing, as I almost
certainly missed some will Sarah call in the observers and demand a recount?
surprising, from all the debates I missed :S
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 5:39 PM, nadia siddiqi <nadshi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> two points away from what?
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Sarah Lynch <
> sarah.lynch.llb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Goddammit - 2 points away. I already have my amazon cart full :'( ah well,
>> this month I must try harder!
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Work done with anxiety about results is far inferior to work done without
> such anxiety, in the calm of self-surrender. Seek refuge in the knowledge of
> Brahman. They who work selfishly for results are miserable. --"Bhagavad
> Gita."
>
--
Work done with anxiety about results is far inferior to work done without
such anxiety, in the calm of self-surrender. Seek refuge in the knowledge of
Brahman. They who work selfishly for results are miserable. --"Bhagavad
Gita."
Other related posts:
