[Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
- From: "Alex Helling" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:31:01 -0000
Hi,
I am sorry for not getting your 1st request, I am afraid that i don't pay
much attention to emails from the RRT as they are nearly always simply
requesting a particular topic hence I have said before to email me directly
if you want to be removed as I am much more likely to notice it than it
being in amongst the mass of RRT mail. I have now unsubscribed you from the
email list.
Regard,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of A.I. Maddox
Sent: 29 November 2009 23:50
To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
Me as well please, this is the third time i've asked...
On Nov 29 2009, Gaurav Jund wrote:
>hi
>
> can you please remove me from your database please .i really dont have
> time to response the emails these days. thank you
>
>
>________________________________
>From: Douglas Jefferson <thebigd003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: Thu, November 26, 2009 10:25:27 AM
>Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates
>
> Hi all, Can I help take the religion conflict one, checking e-mails and
> think only one person is on it though sorry if I have made a mistake.
> Doug ________________________________ From: alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx To:
> debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates Date:
> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:04:44 +0000
>
>
> Dear Timothy I have taken you off the list, done quickly as to prevent
> you getting the weekly barrage of people taking debates. If you have
> any feedback from your time on the RRT it would be appreciated.
> Otherwise I hope you will still visit Debatewise and contribute.
>
> Good luck with the future. Regards, Alex Helling
> From:debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> timothy.alderslade@xxxxxxxxx Sent: 24 November 2009 19:57 To:
> debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Debatewise RRT] Re: debates Hi
> please can you delete me from your database i don't really have the
> time to contribute at the moment, thanks.Sent using BlackBerryR from
> Orange
>
>
>________________________________
>
> From: "Alex Helling" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009
> 19:54:37 -0000 To: <debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [Debatewise
> RRT] debates Hi all, Eeeek im late! Sorry for being late
> with this - even if you don't mind it means I get home very late so I
> do mind! I think that I should mention since we are getting more
> people on the RRT who are not necessarily taking debates from our list
> but instead mostly coming up with their own debate titles that there
> is an option for a digest version of the emails from the RRT. I
> realise that particularly on Tuesday and Wednesday we create a large
> number of emails so anyone who does not rely on getting the email ASAP
> in order to be able to grab the topic they want may wish to get the
> daily digest. Email me if you wish to have your preferences changed. I
think you can probably do it yourself
> but can't be bothered to explain how! Regards, Alex Debates:
> Information should be translated into minority languages. While the
> language of the nation is English in order for many minorities some
> are not fluent enough in English to understand government information
> given out in English. So even if the numbers are very small they need
> to have information published in their language. Minority British
> languages such as Gaelic or Welsh appear on road signs as well as
information leaflets.
> Now the Scottish parliament has even translated some of its website
> into scots. Pointless or necessary?
> http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/vli/language/scots/index.htm
>
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1227837/Walcome-tae-Scottish-Pairlam
ent-wabsite-The-internet-guide-Holyrood--translated-Scots-dialect.html
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6172805.stm Should players loyalty be
> to their club over their country? In most sports the best members of
> each team are likely to be called up to serve the country in national
matches.
> This can often be in direct conflict with the interests of the club to
> whom the player belongs, either there are clashes in fixtures or the
> club wishes their star players to be rested so that they can be at
> their best for their key club matches. However for a player playing
> for your country is something to be prized, especially if it is in
> prestigious matches, it helps them get noticed internationally.
> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/world-cup-2010/teams/england
> /3479028/The-Debate-Should-England-players-put-country-before-their-cl
> ubs-Football.html
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/may/25/theo-walcott-arsenal-en
> gland-wenger
>
http://www.cricketworld.com/internationalcricketnews/new_zealand/article/?ai
d=21428
> U2 the right band to headline next year's Glastonbury festival? U2
> is finally to headline at Glastonbury. While they are a major band who
> have been roumered as a possible headline for years their style of
> concert does not fit in well with Glastonbury. Their concerts are too
> big for the context of being set within a festival so U2 have tended
> to avoid festivals.
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/nov/23/u2-glastonbury-festival
>
http://www.nme.com/blog/index.php?blog=10&title=u2_to_headline_glastonbury_5
_reasons_it_&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
> Today's children are "over sanitised" by health and safety regulations.
> Children used to be much freer in their possible activities, they
> would play football on the streets, could spend all day out and about
> engaging in activities like fishing without adult supervision. Now
> health and safety may keep children safe and healthy as advertised but
> it stifles their freedom, they can no longer do anything without an
> adult present, and the adults in turn are tightly regulated. Is there
> any adventure left for children?
> http://www.nhs.uk/news/2009/11November/Pages/Is-dirt-good-for-kids.asp
> x http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8373690.stm
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2008/mar/30/children.health China
> should be responsible for security in South Asia. China's role in
> South Asia has not often been positive, propping up the junta in
> Myanmar, helping Pakistan no matter what Pakistan does, aiding the
> Maoists in Nepal. China has certainly not gone out of its way to
> recognise that India might have a sphere of influence. However in his
> visit to China Obama appeared to support a more active role for China
> in South Asia, not the way to win over the Indians!
> http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KK21Df03.html
> http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/KC14Df01.html
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/world/asia/24india.html?ref=asia New
> York is the right place for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed's trial. 9/11 is
> imprinted on New York's consciousness. As the place where the
> spectacular attacks on the world trade centre took place it can be
> seen as both the best and the worst place to hold Khalid Sheikh
> Mohammed's trial. It has huge symbolic meaning, but there is less
> chance of a fair trial in a city that has lost so many people in the
> attacks. There may have been dislike at the possibility of a military
> trial but such a trial would be less likely to be swayed by public
> opinion and the inevitable media blitz. So is New York the right place?
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/14/us/14terror.html
>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/13/911-mastermind-trial-challenges-
analysis
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/24/opinion/24iht-edgerson.html Cadbury
> should not be sold. Cadbury is an iconic business. As it was a Quaker
> company Cadbury is a business with a soul. The vultures are however
> circling, Kraft has launched a hostile bid and others may follow suit.
> Most big business mergers and acquisitions do not result in the
> savings advertised and instead destroy the culture of one or other
> firm. So do the benefits outweigh the costs of a takeover, or should
> we hold onto a national asset?
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229813/Keep-Cadbury-British-N
> ew-union-fears-jobs-Americans-sweet-iconic-UK-chocolate-maker.html
> http://www.confectionerynews.com/The-Big-Picture/Chocolate-market-set-
> to-consolidate-says-analyst (there is a magazine to have on 'Have I
> got news for you' eh?)
>
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/poll/2009/sep/07/cadbury-kraft-british-br
and
> Will Europe always be considered the foreign land for the British?
> Europe as an island nation has always been a bit isolated from the
> rest of Europe. While the continental Europeans seem to get along well
> with each other and be increasingly considering themselves European we
> lag behind. Britain is as Euroskeptic as ever. No one is willing to
> make the case for us becoming closer to Europe and increasing trade
> does not seem to be working. Europe remains a foreign place to go on
> holiday rather than part of the national identity.
> http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/dominic-lawson/domin
> ic-lawson-europe-will-always-be-a-foreign-land-for-the-british-1826457
> .html http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8045178.stm
>
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brown-britain-must-be-at-heart
-of-europe-1826290.html
> Does religion cause conflict? Religion is at the heart of many
> conflicts in the world today. Samuel P. Huntingdons Clash of
> Civilisations based civilisations upon religion, civilisations will
> clash so religions will clash. And it is religion that causes this.
> Religion unifies within a religion but creates an 'other' against which to
fight.
> It becomes easy to justify conflict based upon religious principles.
> However religion also preaches peace. So does religion create
> conflict, or bring us together?
> http://www.thebcobserver.com/2009/10/27/does-religion-cause-more-confl
> ict-than-good/
> http://www.secularism.org.uk/religioncauseswarsitdoesntsolvet.html
> http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/49414/samuel-p-huntington/if-no
> t-civilizations-what-samuel-huntington-responds-to-his-crit
> http://history.club.fatih.edu.tr/103%20Huntington%20Clash%20of%20Civil
> izations%20full%20text.htm (as this is a very big question I suggest
> at least two of you take it on)
> Use Revisewise @ http://revisewise.debatewise.com/
> ________________________________ Have more than one Hotmail account?
> Link them together to easily access both.
>
>
>
Other related posts:
