[ddots-l] Re: vista vs xp with jaws
- From: "Gordon Kent" <dbmusic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2008 02:58:38 -0400
BlankYeah the event view would be a problem for sure. But I think that for
that you could just temporarilly load jaws.
Gord
----- Original Message -----
From: Phil Muir
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2008 10:47 AM
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: vista vs xp with jaws
Gord wrote: Well, maybe not. As sonar gets more and more control surface
support, we should be ablt to access more and more parameters from the control
surface sdk.
The only problems may be inserting plugs and selecting presets, but I would
think there would be a workaround for that.
Phil replied: also, accessing parameters and clicking buttons in plug-ins
could be an issue. Mind you, it wouldn't be if NVDA had an equivalent of
HotSpotClicker built-into it and if NVDA could read off the CWACCESS Window
then, maybe not. Also, actually inserting plug-ins shouldn't be an issue as
there is the applications key for that.
Gord wrote: I don't think we need the video to do much any more. We can get
location, selected status, markers, levels, and even the effect names and
through act many parameters. All this stuff
is exposed in the control surface sdk which can certainly be called from a
program like nvda, and through wineyes new scripting environment. I really
think I could write a set of scripts that will hardly need to look at the
video display at all.
Phil replied: possibly however, in order for this to really work without a
video driver, we would need control surface support or CWACCESS Window or,
similar for the event view, as that currently relies on video driver support.
Regards, Phil Muir
P J Muir Productions,
Music And Audio Production
Telephone: US (615) 713-2021
UK+44-1747-821-794
Mobile: UK +44-7968-136-246
E-mail:
info@xxxxxxxxxxxx
URL:
www.philmuir.com/
Other related posts:
