[ddots-l] Re: CT for Sonar1 or 2x or not

  • From: "James Malone" <malone_j@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:49:27 -0700

Don't know, but someone posted something sometime last week.

 

From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neville Peter
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 8:45 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] Re: CT for Sonar1 or 2x or not

 

What kind of new affects are out there in X1? How much better are they than
what we have in sonar 8.5?

 

May the Peace of God which passes all understanding guard your heart and
mind in Christ Jesus. God bless you! 

 

Website http://www.nevillepeter.com

 

Email neville@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 

 

Phone 407-222-4488

 

Web store http://www.nevillepeter.com/store

 

 

From: ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ddots-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James Malone
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 10:27 AM
To: ddots-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ddots-l] CT for Sonar1 or 2x or not

 

Hi all, It's been at least three years since Sonar  8.5 has been released,
so this brings up a question if a new version of CT will ever be on the
table. I know that 8.5 still works, but with all the new effects that are
out there with 1x is leaving us in the dust. Has anyone heard of any
changes? If Cake Talking isn't the answer, then is anyone else working on
scripts for 1x? I realize that post like this was visited a year ago, and
it's that time again.

Next year, it will be someone else asking the big question. 

James

Other related posts: