[softwarelist] Re: Unwanted font definitions

  • From: David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 13:57:27 +0100

In message <4fb2e1d238Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Torrens (lists)" <Lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes

Yes, having to admit that there is no future in a OS you do like, and
moving to an OS you do not, simply to make a living, must be a a major
de-motivator.

RISC OS was far ahead of Microsoft in 1988, it is now far behind. There's a lot wrong with RISC OS from a 2008 perspective.

I have not made a living from Windows, my Windows experience has been more dispiriting than my RISC OS one.

But you have always been reluctant to do chargeable upgrades for RISC OS.
Are there enough changes you could port back into RO to appease your
conscience about making an upgrade charge, and are there enough RO users
left and willing to pay a charge to make it worth your while?

My feeling about charging for RISC OS upgrades post 1998 has been that to do so was misleading (things were not going to go on for ever).

Nearly ten years after Acorn. I think I was wrong about a couple of things, RISC OS has gone on longer than I expected and I might as well have put the four years work that went into Ovation Pro for Windows into the RISC OS version.

Paid for upgrades would not have saved Ovation Pro, the thing that would have done, was more users. I needed more people to see the copies in use and say "this is fantastic I must have it".

All this comes back to finding a way forward...

I'm thinking something like putting the source code into the public domain and myself departing to a new venture. However this is easier to say than to do.



--
David Pilling
email: david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  web: http://www.davidpilling.net
 post: David Pilling P.O. Box 22 Thornton Cleveleys Blackpool. FY5 1LR UK
  fax: +44(0)870-0520-941


To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling

Other related posts: