In message of 26 Feb, Chris Hughes <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <005201c63abd$c6d5fb20$90da69d5@xp> > "Arthur Lacey" <tedell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > From: "Tim Powys-Lybbe" <tim@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > >> But think of the expense here in (a) buying full versions of XP and > >> then (b) buying manuals to tell me what on earth it was doing. Not to > >> mention the wasted time on this group answering questions about "how do > >> you do this?". > > > > My advice would be to wait for the 64 bit version of Windows due for release > > later in the year. Of course you might need to get a new PC as well. :-) > > 64bit version of XP is already out and has been for several months! I > assume you mean Vista which is still in beta and well behind schedule > at the moment. Rumour has it a lot of software could require an update > to work on vista..... I forgot to add that I run my PC on a emulator program on a Mac as this handles all I need for the very occasional files that won't run elsewhere. I suspect that this environment won't cope with much more of XP's bells and whistles. -- Tim Powys-Lybbe tim@xxxxxxxxx For a miscellany of bygones: http://powys.org