On 24 Nov 2009, at 11:38, David Pilling wrote: > In message <E8F45E6F-D5FA-4FEE-83A7-DFC9496F1A5C@xxxxxxxx>, Clive Bonsall > <cbonsall@xxxxxxx> writes >> turn off Direct PostScript and it works (I forgot I had DPS turned on by >> default). It's possible to have DPS output, but the procedure has to be >> <Print to file> and drop the resulting PS file into Acrobat Distiller. > > That is interesting. It raises the question when did Acrobat require DPS > turned off. Not sure -- as I recall, OPW with DPS selected wouldn't print to Acrobat 8, but would print to Acrobat 4. When I get time, I'll check it with Acrobat 4 (and 5-7, if I can find machines with those versions installed). > My memory is that there was a good reason to have DPS switched on (forgotten, > but usually better quality, features like CMYK output) and good reasons to > have it switched off (support for meta files). I don't use meta files, and I've always found that DPS gave better quality for complex documents. And wasn't there some issue with images that have a transparent background? ========================================== C.B. ========================================== To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling