[softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- From: Martin Wuerthner <public@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: davidpilling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2008 11:38:01 +0100
In message <4f7d331d1fdave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dave Symes <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In article <47D319C2.9050106@xxxxxxxx>,
> Clive Bonsall <C.Bonsall@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Interestingly, I've just noticed that in Vista it's possible to change
>> the user account type between "standard" and "administrator". However,
>> even tho' I had my own named account set to "administrator" it still did
>> not give me complete freedom to make changes. Only when I switched to
>> the default Administrator account was I able to do this ... curious!
> Apparently, there are two levels of administrator accounts in Vista, a bog
> standard Admin access, and a higher level Admin access.
Even with the same account you have two different levels of access. By
default, when logged in as an admin you only have the same rights as a
standard user. Only when you run a process "elevated" it gets the full
admin rights. This is part of User Account Control (UAC).
> Can't remember the minutia now, did read it a while back and thought,
> !$£%&*^()****??! and moved on.
Things are far worse than that. For instance, you may be logged in as
an admin and change some system file (or registry entry) and you will
find that everything looks OK, but if you have UAC enabled (which it
is by default) you will find out later that Windows has not actually
changed the system file at all, it has only created a file in your
local user store and overlays it onto the system file to make you
think the change has happened. When you log in again as the same user
you see the changed file but the system itself or other users still
see the original system file, so the files Windows shows you, even
when you are logged in as an admin, are not those that are stored on
the hard disc.
VirtualRPC stores its HostFS directory (the emulated RiscPC hard disc)
in its installation directory, which effectively stops VirtualRPC from
working correctly on Vista while UAC is on. With UAC off it works
fine.
Martin
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin Wuerthner MW Software martin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling
- References:
- [softwarelist] OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
Other related posts:
- » [softwarelist] OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)
- » [softwarelist] Re: OPW - Font list, XP vs Vista (32-bit)