[ctw] Re: ASSP and MAPI question
- From: Tom Shaw <tshaw@xxxxxxxx>
- To: ctw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 14:04:54 -0400
At 11:42 AM -0500 4/20/09, Rick Hazey wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 11:27 AM, webcatalog@xxxxxxx wrote:
Why wouldn't you send ti through assp?
It's not that I don't want to send through ASSP but it's SMTP only.
As I understand it, ASSP acts as a proxy for SMTP from an
authenticated user sending email. If the user sends via MAPI or
webmail, the outgoing message will never pass through ASSP.
I understand MAPI (boy you are paying through the nose of those
users) but why webmail? Unless its OWM
We have a lot of clients using MAPI and webmail, so I'm concerned
that ASSP won't work very well under those circumstances.
I don't understand won't work. Of course it works; its a matter of
what you see as the amount of care and feeding that needs to be
perofrmed.
If all mail goes through ASSP then you off load management to your
users. If some outbound mail goes through ASSP then bayesian can
still be constructed and you could provide a web based interface to
be used in lieu of the email interface for control by those who use
MAPI. That would be pretty simple. If no outbound then build web I/F
for control and tell ASSP to infer not spam from incoming mail unless
overridden by your users using the web interface.
Tom
--
Tom Shaw - Chief Engineer, OITC
<tshaw at oitc.com>, http://www.oitc.com/ local wx: http://www.oitc.com/weather
US Phone Numbers: 321-984-3714, 321-729-6258(fax),
321-258-2475(cell/voice mail,pager)
Text Paging: http://www.oitc.com/Pager/sendmessage.html
AIM/iChat: trshaw@xxxxxxx
Fish more and Live longer
Circle The Wagons
manage: //www.freelists.org/list/ctw
post: mailto:ctw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
unsubscribe: mailto:ctw-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
search: //www.freelists.org/archives/ctw
faq: //www.freelists.org/wiki/the_faq
Other related posts:
