[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

  • From: Michael Best <themikebest@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx, cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 09:22:52 -0400

John has yet to post a notice on his site alerting users to the log's
leaking and the possible compromise, but he has added a warning about a
"growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of archives,
torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites." So that's something?

Mirrors of the Cryptome Archive should be accessed with caution, none have
been authenticated by Cryptome and sigs can be faked to hide tampering.
There is growing censor-tamper-implant-bowdlerize-redact-tag-track of
archives, torrents, drops, shares, wikis, disclosure sites.

I guess John was right before. "Compromise should be publicized but seldom
is: *hide, deny, ignore, delude*."

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 9:09 AM, Michael Best <themikebest@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You can read through the emails for yourself, no doubt. Start with the
original email about the GCHQ slide with redacted IPs, where I ask for

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Cari Machet <carimachet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Show me the email where you called for help ... i have been traveling
heavy so missed it

The type of work of forensics research is important and how ot is
conducted is as well

Its not about my personal stamp of approval it is about community and
respecting of and embodiment of the community

If anyone including john is being a fucker we need to account for that
On Oct 10, 2015 12:04 PM, "Michael Best" <themikebest@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The list had been involved since the first post about the GCHQ slide.
The list was no help at all.

Sorry you don't approve, Cari, but what's done is done. The list was
consulted and no help. John Young refused to acknowledge the problem - *or
fix it. *[sarcasm] But what's terribly wrong is that I reported it -
*not* that John leaked it or lied it about it when he kept denying it
or anything else. [/sarcasm]

*Cari Machet* carimachet@xxxxxxxxx

*Sat Oct 10 04:51:59 EDT 2015*Still michael best you could have
consulted the list here That someone calls you a liar therefor you act is
an ego based mindset Answer why you decided to not consult this list that
has profoundly smart
beings on it You could have asked this list for help we are interested
in helping with
such matters i would say and you could have done so without revealing
... did this never cross your mind ? If it never even crossed your mind
to consult us i find there is something
terribly wrong

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 12:01 AM, coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 10/9/15, Michael Best <themikebest@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... *they never would've been published. *

i find it useful to think of voice. published yes, with little voice.

now it's most certainly a loud something!
the published always was, however...

Other related posts: