Interesting,the dissemination
Of misinformation. How to tell
the truth, without compromising the tangled web,like they say at Bohemian
Grove,no tangled web here.
Respectfully, Iao
On 9 Oct 2015 14:22, "Shelley" <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On October 9, 2015 4:51:44 PM Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am not surprised that GCHQ does what you claim it does.
Have you read about this from the beginning? If so, you'd know that Mike
Best is not the one claiming that the GCHQ slide is real. He is trying to
establish whether nearly anyone could have made the slide with the logs
Cryptome leaked/distributed/whatever, unwittingly or otherwise. That's
all, and I don't know how a researcher trying to verify data has become a
giant shitstorm.
-S
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:11:50 -0400
Subject: [cryptome]
From: themikebest@xxxxxxxxx
To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To the original point, the GCHQ Snowden slide. Cryptome accusing me of
faking the data was a diversion. Only had to verify it because of the GCHQ
slide.
From: Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:00:48 +1300So, now you
have named and shamed Cryptome for this grievance you have, whereto
know?
