[cryptome] Re: [cryptome]

  • From: Shelley <shelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, cypherpunks <cypherpunks@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:22:21 -0700

On October 9, 2015 4:51:44 PM Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I am not surprised that GCHQ does what you claim it does.


Have you read about this from the beginning? If so, you'd know that Mike Best is not the one claiming that the GCHQ slide is real. He is trying to establish whether nearly anyone could have made the slide with the logs Cryptome leaked/distributed/whatever, unwittingly or otherwise. That's all, and I don't know how a researcher trying to verify data has become a giant shitstorm.

-S

Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:11:50 -0400
Subject: [cryptome]
From: themikebest@xxxxxxxxx
To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

To the original point, the GCHQ Snowden slide. Cryptome accusing me of faking the data was a diversion. Only had to verify it because of the GCHQ slide.
From: Jeremy Compton <j.compton@xxxxxxxxxxx>To: "cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 12:00:48 +1300So, now you have named and shamed Cryptome for this grievance you have, whereto
know?




Other related posts: