[cryptome] Re: [cryptography] Snowden docs show none are originals of spies
- From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:29:05 -0800
On 12/31/14, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PDF properties of Snowden docs show none are originals of spies.
> Likely sanitized-redacted by Snowden/outlets, originals need open scrutiny.
some are differently sanitized from different outlets.
some are odd angle glimpses from a projected snapshot.
some are even worse captures of once, twice, how many? derived from origin.
some of these formats have a quality or straight-forward text representation.
some have a mostly correct auto-mate-able representation.
some need manual inspection and interpretation / annotation by earth human.
some have a representation that can be identified by one of the public
and clarified.
this is actually a fun problem. want to help fix? annotate such links
from a set of database files :)
see also, "Hash this motherfucker..."
Other related posts:
