[cryptome] Re: [cryptography] Snowden docs show none are originals of spies

  • From: coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 11:29:05 -0800

On 12/31/14, John Young <jya@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> PDF properties of Snowden docs show none are originals of spies.
> Likely sanitized-redacted by Snowden/outlets, originals need open scrutiny.

some are differently sanitized from different outlets.
 some are odd angle glimpses from a projected snapshot.
  some are even worse captures of once, twice, how many? derived from origin.

some of these formats have a quality or straight-forward text representation.
some have a mostly correct auto-mate-able representation.
some need manual inspection and interpretation / annotation by earth human.
some have a representation that can be identified by one of the public
and clarified.

this is actually a fun problem. want to help fix? annotate such links
from a set of database files :)

see also, "Hash this motherfucker..."

Other related posts: