[cryptome] Re: The Compromised Internet
- From: In Harms Way <11414150173@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:35:09 +0300
On the less philosophical and less pessimistic level, John, have you
tested BM bitmessage:
www.bitmessage.org
or HB hushbox
http://ih4pgsz3aepacbwl.onion/p-ReM/hushbox/Hushbox+Mail+%E2%80%93+BETA+0.1/
... and your judgement is ...????
John Young wrote, On 25/09/2013 23:07:
> Now that it appears the Internet is compromised what other
> means can rapidly deliver tiny fragments of an encrypted
> message, each unique for transmission, then reassembled
> upon receipt, kind of like packets but much smaller and less
> predictable, dare say random?
>
> The legacy transceiver technologies prior to the Internet or
> developed parallel to it, burst via radio, microwave, EM emanations,
> laser, ELF, moon or planetary bounce, spread spectrum, ELF,
> hydro, olfactory, quanta, and the like.
>
> Presumably if these are possible they will remain classified, kept
> in research labs for advanced study, or shelved for future use.
>
> Quite a few are hinted at, redacted and partially described in
> NSA technical publications from 25-50 or so years ago. Many
> developed for military use and the best never shared with the
> public.
>
> A skeptic might suppose the internet was invented and promoted as
> a diversion along with public-use digital cryptography. This ruse
> has led to immense growth in transmission-breakable ciphers
> as well as vulnerable transceivers. Packet techology could hardly
> be surpased for tappability as Snowden and cohorts disclose the
> tip of the iceberg. Ironically, the cohorts believe encryption protects
> their communications, conceals his location and cloaks the
> depositories.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
