[cryptome] Re: The Compromised Internet

  • From: In Harms Way <11414150173@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 23:35:09 +0300

On the less philosophical and less pessimistic level, John, have you
tested BM bitmessage:

or HB hushbox

... and your judgement is ...????

John Young wrote, On 25/09/2013 23:07:
> Now that it appears the Internet is compromised what other
> means can rapidly deliver tiny fragments of an encrypted
> message, each unique for transmission, then reassembled
> upon receipt, kind of like packets but much smaller and less
> predictable, dare say random?
> The legacy transceiver technologies prior to the Internet or
> developed parallel to it, burst via radio, microwave, EM emanations,
> laser, ELF, moon or planetary bounce, spread spectrum, ELF,
> hydro, olfactory, quanta, and the like.
> Presumably if these are possible they will remain classified, kept
> in research labs for advanced study, or shelved for future use.
> Quite a few are hinted at, redacted and partially described in
> NSA technical publications from 25-50 or so years ago. Many
> developed for military use and the best never shared with the
> public.
> A skeptic might suppose the internet was invented and promoted as
> a diversion along with public-use digital cryptography. This ruse
> has led to immense growth in transmission-breakable ciphers
> as well as vulnerable transceivers. Packet techology could hardly
> be surpased for tappability as Snowden and cohorts disclose the
> tip of the iceberg. Ironically, the cohorts believe encryption protects
> their communications, conceals his location and cloaks the
> depositories.

Other related posts: