It's already a blatant war crime attacking with one singular Tomahawk. Here's ten crucial points to contemplate. They should suffice well for to understand that these types of acts are war crimes... <http://tinyurl.com/kkjgu3s>http://tinyurl.com/kkjgu3s
Kenneth Rasmusson Free Editor in Sweden 2013-08-28, Andrew Hornback wrote:
Okay, let's say that we drop a couple of Tomahawks (which aren't cheap, since I'm thinking as a US taxpayer at this point) on a chemical weapons depot in Syria... causing the instantaneous release of those chemical weapons on the area surrounding the depot. Â While the initial attack is a 100% bullseye (hypothetically), the attack ends up killing or otherwise maiming 10,000 Syrian citizens. Â Is that not an act of aggression, bordering on an act of war, on the part of the United States?