You sound ridiculously unreasonable. It must be ok by you if people are killed senselessly because a people and or a religious faith thinks it is ok to kill the other party even if there is no aggression. How would you describe incidences where people launch a war to gain attention and when killed it is branded as whatever they wish to call it. I am sure you'll rather Christians, Israelis, Americans and the British be killed as long as it fits neatly into your own view point. Countries go to war for strategic reasons...how about that Peter???... Sent from my BlackBerry® Smartphone, from Etisalat. Enjoy high speed internet service with Etisalat easy net, available at all our experience centres -----Original Message----- From: Peter Presland <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sender: cryptome-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:24:25 To: <cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: cryptome@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [cryptome] Re: Syria Substitute 'Gaza' and 'Palestinian' for 'Syria' and 'Syrian' below and you have a pretty accurate description of Israeli war crimes in 2008. Their preferred illegal CW's just happened to be white phosphorous and more people were killed - including over 400 children. But it's not a war crime if Israel does it eh? On 29/08/2013 13:35, Haim Barak wrote: > What has happened in Syria is not a local event but a crime against humanity > , violations of international law is responsible therefore joins world to > respond to that. Syria was an ethical boundary violation, violation of > international > law. The entire world witnessed the difficult images of the bodies of Syrian > children lying on the floor. President Obama spoke for all of humanity when > he said that there can be no violation of international law, mass murder > without adequate response. We understand that this time the reaction is > global rather than local.